First Kings
Saturday, August 7, 2010
More Than Imagined
(I Kings 8:62-66)
We often make the mistake of not planning big enough. Church fellowships serve as an example of this problem. It’s difficult to estimate the number attending, so those providing food need to guess at how much to prepare. After years of experience, we get it right—most of the time. Since I’d rather have too much than too little, I always encourage the ladies to plan for a big crowd. After all, leftovers can be used elsewhere or taken home by the cleanup crew. It’s better to plan for a lot and have too much than to plan for a few and have too little. I heard a motto a while back that summarizes this thought nicely: “Go big or go home.” It’s better to plan bigger.
Solomon had completed one of the most aggressive architectural wonders of the ancient world, Jehovah’s temple. Everything was built on a grand scale. Frankly, there was nothing that could compare to it in Solomon’s day. God is a big God, and Solomon accordingly built a big temple. On dedication day, however, Solomon may have had misgivings. For a few moments it appeared that Solomon had not built big enough. In an interesting historical note, the Bible tells us that Solomon had to “hallow the middle of the court that was before the house of the Lord.” He did so in order to make it a place of offering because “the brazen altar that was before the Lord was too little to receive the burnt offerings” (64).
Solomon learned a valuable lesson that day: God blesses us well beyond our service for Him. The most costly sacrifice made on God’s behalf pays dividends many times beyond the value of our time, efforts, and resources. David said, “…my cup runneth over,” meaning that God blesses beyond our ability to contain it. Let’s not limit God. Let’s keep our vision big, knowing that God can easily outdo our efforts with His blessing. Pray big prayers, and expect bigger answers. Make big plans, and expect bigger results. Remember, God is “…able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think” (Eph. 3:20).
Thursday, July 29, 2010
The Reign of King Solomon
First Kings
Friday, August 6, 2010
Not One Word
(I Kings 8:54-61)
Life comes with a lot of limited warranties. Store clerks press consumers to purchase product guarantees that run beyond the standard warranties, warning customers that their best products are bound to fail at some point. For years it was rumored that automobile manufacturers built decay into their products in order to insure repeat purchases in the future. Even the best warranties come with fine print—often so limiting as to void the warranty before the product leaves the sales floor. In short, the promises, guarantees, and warranties of this world frequently are not worth the paper on which they’re printed. Horror stories abound; ask anyone.
In refreshing contrast to the world’s shaky promises, Solomon testified of God’s fidelity to His word. In verse 56 Solomon boldly proclaimed, “…there hath not failed one word of all his good promise which he promised by the hand of Moses his servant.” Think about it: Not one word that God promised slipped away unfulfilled. Remember, too, that Moses’ predictions for his fledgling nation were vast—reaching far beyond Solomon’s time and even our own. In a sense, Solomon invited the Israelites to check the record. They could go back to the words of Moses and see if God had been faithful to His promises. Without exception, God had kept His word.
Not only had God kept His word, but the fulfillment of God’s promises was easily verifiable by Solomon. Solomon took God’s promises literally and expected a literal fulfillment. God never failed to deliver in a fashion easily verifiable by a man simply reading his Bible.
Solomon’s words remind us of the words of Jesus. He said, “...Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled” (Mt. 5:18). In other words, Jesus Christ verified God’s fidelity in fulfilling the smallest detail of His word. God keeps His promises. You can safely trust in Him.
Friday, August 6, 2010
Not One Word
(I Kings 8:54-61)
Life comes with a lot of limited warranties. Store clerks press consumers to purchase product guarantees that run beyond the standard warranties, warning customers that their best products are bound to fail at some point. For years it was rumored that automobile manufacturers built decay into their products in order to insure repeat purchases in the future. Even the best warranties come with fine print—often so limiting as to void the warranty before the product leaves the sales floor. In short, the promises, guarantees, and warranties of this world frequently are not worth the paper on which they’re printed. Horror stories abound; ask anyone.
In refreshing contrast to the world’s shaky promises, Solomon testified of God’s fidelity to His word. In verse 56 Solomon boldly proclaimed, “…there hath not failed one word of all his good promise which he promised by the hand of Moses his servant.” Think about it: Not one word that God promised slipped away unfulfilled. Remember, too, that Moses’ predictions for his fledgling nation were vast—reaching far beyond Solomon’s time and even our own. In a sense, Solomon invited the Israelites to check the record. They could go back to the words of Moses and see if God had been faithful to His promises. Without exception, God had kept His word.
Not only had God kept His word, but the fulfillment of God’s promises was easily verifiable by Solomon. Solomon took God’s promises literally and expected a literal fulfillment. God never failed to deliver in a fashion easily verifiable by a man simply reading his Bible.
Solomon’s words remind us of the words of Jesus. He said, “...Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled” (Mt. 5:18). In other words, Jesus Christ verified God’s fidelity in fulfilling the smallest detail of His word. God keeps His promises. You can safely trust in Him.
The Reign of King Solomon
First Kings
Thursday, August 5, 2010
When Worse Comes to Worse
(I Kings 8:44-53)
Whenever someone asks, “What’s the worst that can happen?” you better look out! More often than not, the worst possible circumstance is headed your way—likely at the speed of light. When someone suggests the worst outcome as a real possibility, fasten your seatbelts! Worse coming to worse is more likely than we’re comfortable admitting. When things get bad, they usually get markedly worse. That’s just how it is in life.
Solomon, along with the nation, was on a spiritual high. The presence of the Lord had just filled the newly completed temple. God gave his nod of approval by visibly taking up residence in Jerusalem. He sanctified the temple by His manifest presence. After such a benchmark spiritual experience, how could either the nation or the king ever stray from God?
As a wise king, Solomon was aware that the spiritual high of dedication day wouldn’t last forever. The nation, more quickly than imagined, would settle into a comfortable spiritual routine. Temple worship would become more commonplace. Sacrifices that were once the delight of the worshipper would become a bit burdensome. In short, the presence of God would eventually be taken for granted. Once the people tired of Jehovah, they would—as history testifies—turn to heathen idols. And, of course, God’s wrath would fall upon His people.
Solomon foresaw a day when worse would come to worse—when God’s people would be taken in captivity (46). But he also saw the possibility of Israel’s repentance and return (47, 48). So he prayed that God would hear His people exiled in foreign lands (49). He prayed that God would sustain them, and that He would forgive them (50). When worse comes to worse in your life, when you sin grievously against God, remember that His ear is attuned to your penitent cry. He is eager to forgive, and in forgiving, He restores.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
When Worse Comes to Worse
(I Kings 8:44-53)
Whenever someone asks, “What’s the worst that can happen?” you better look out! More often than not, the worst possible circumstance is headed your way—likely at the speed of light. When someone suggests the worst outcome as a real possibility, fasten your seatbelts! Worse coming to worse is more likely than we’re comfortable admitting. When things get bad, they usually get markedly worse. That’s just how it is in life.
Solomon, along with the nation, was on a spiritual high. The presence of the Lord had just filled the newly completed temple. God gave his nod of approval by visibly taking up residence in Jerusalem. He sanctified the temple by His manifest presence. After such a benchmark spiritual experience, how could either the nation or the king ever stray from God?
As a wise king, Solomon was aware that the spiritual high of dedication day wouldn’t last forever. The nation, more quickly than imagined, would settle into a comfortable spiritual routine. Temple worship would become more commonplace. Sacrifices that were once the delight of the worshipper would become a bit burdensome. In short, the presence of God would eventually be taken for granted. Once the people tired of Jehovah, they would—as history testifies—turn to heathen idols. And, of course, God’s wrath would fall upon His people.
Solomon foresaw a day when worse would come to worse—when God’s people would be taken in captivity (46). But he also saw the possibility of Israel’s repentance and return (47, 48). So he prayed that God would hear His people exiled in foreign lands (49). He prayed that God would sustain them, and that He would forgive them (50). When worse comes to worse in your life, when you sin grievously against God, remember that His ear is attuned to your penitent cry. He is eager to forgive, and in forgiving, He restores.
The Reign of King Solomon
First Kings
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Strangers
(I Kings 8:41-43)
From earliest age children are taught an aversion to “strangers.” “Don’t talk to strangers,” our mothers warned us. And while their advice to us was good, we can be glad that God doesn’t feel the same way. In fact, God seeks strangers—those who are estranged from Him by sin. Rather than being warily repulsed by us, God has taken the initiative to establish a relationship with His wayward creation. Strangers are the objects of God’s love and desire.
In dedicating the temple, Solomon recognized it as a place of worship unique to God’s covenant people, Israel. He understood that the sacrifices, ritual, prayers, songs, and offerings would all be distinctly Jewish, offered in accordance with the Mosaic legislation. And, of course, the temple would represent the seat of Israel’s God. The whole thing would be unapologetically Jewish—by Jews, for Jews.
Solomon, however, also recognized a larger purpose for his temple. With tremendous foresight, Solomon predicted a day when “strangers,” non Israelites, would seek Jehovah (41). He knew that the God of the universe could not be confined to Israel alone. He envisioned gentiles converting to Judaism and coming into the temple to pray (42)! In fact, the outer court of the temple was specifically designed as a place for gentile worship! Though the Jews got the front seats, the “strangers” were not forgotten by God.
Solomon even prayed that God would answer the prayers of gentile worshippers (43). He realized that “all the people of the earth” need to “know [God’s] name.” So rather than excluding gentile supplicants, Solomon invited them to Israel’s house of worship to pray to Israel’s God. From earliest times God purposed to save gentiles. In Old Testament times, the gentile conversion rate was a trickle. In New Testament times, the church is largely a gentile bride. Admittedly, the temple was distinctively Jewish, but—even in the Old Testament dispensations—God loved “strangers” too!
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Strangers
(I Kings 8:41-43)
From earliest age children are taught an aversion to “strangers.” “Don’t talk to strangers,” our mothers warned us. And while their advice to us was good, we can be glad that God doesn’t feel the same way. In fact, God seeks strangers—those who are estranged from Him by sin. Rather than being warily repulsed by us, God has taken the initiative to establish a relationship with His wayward creation. Strangers are the objects of God’s love and desire.
In dedicating the temple, Solomon recognized it as a place of worship unique to God’s covenant people, Israel. He understood that the sacrifices, ritual, prayers, songs, and offerings would all be distinctly Jewish, offered in accordance with the Mosaic legislation. And, of course, the temple would represent the seat of Israel’s God. The whole thing would be unapologetically Jewish—by Jews, for Jews.
Solomon, however, also recognized a larger purpose for his temple. With tremendous foresight, Solomon predicted a day when “strangers,” non Israelites, would seek Jehovah (41). He knew that the God of the universe could not be confined to Israel alone. He envisioned gentiles converting to Judaism and coming into the temple to pray (42)! In fact, the outer court of the temple was specifically designed as a place for gentile worship! Though the Jews got the front seats, the “strangers” were not forgotten by God.
Solomon even prayed that God would answer the prayers of gentile worshippers (43). He realized that “all the people of the earth” need to “know [God’s] name.” So rather than excluding gentile supplicants, Solomon invited them to Israel’s house of worship to pray to Israel’s God. From earliest times God purposed to save gentiles. In Old Testament times, the gentile conversion rate was a trickle. In New Testament times, the church is largely a gentile bride. Admittedly, the temple was distinctively Jewish, but—even in the Old Testament dispensations—God loved “strangers” too!
The Reign of King Solomon
First Kings
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
When Heaven Hears
(I Kings 8:27-40)
Folks like to think that God answers every prayer. The truth is that though God hears every prayer, He doesn’t always answer them. In fact, answered prayer is predicated upon the spiritual condition of the supplicant. In other words, the closer you are to the Lord spiritually, the better the possibility that your prayers will be answered. Some prayers, for example, are “dead in the water” before they’re even spoken. For example, when we pray contrary to the revealed will of God, God will not hear our prayer (I John 5:14). Confidence in prayer comes, in part, from praying according to God’s will as revealed in the Bible.
Solomon recognized that the newly built temple would be a house of prayer. Israel would gather within its precincts to bring their petitions before their God. And God would hear—or reject—their petitions based largely upon the condition of their hearts. According to Solomon, effective praying is dependent upon God’s forgiveness. In other words, the supplicant must first be a penitent, acknowledging personal sinfulness, confessing specific sins, and mournfully repenting of spiritual failure.
Four times in today’s Scripture passage, Solomon prays, “…when thou hearest, forgive” (30, 34, 36, and 39). In other words, forgiveness from God is a necessary prerequisite to approaching Him in prayer. The effectiveness of Israel’s prayers depended first upon their standing with God. Once confession and repentance had taken place, God could forgive and then hear their petitions.
Careless living spawns fruitless praying. Before we rush into God’s presence with our grocery list of desires, we would do well to examine ourselves for unconfessed sins and personal failures. Before asking for things, we should ask for cleansing. Every season of prayer should begin with a I John 1:9 attitude: “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Once we’re forgiven, Heaven will hear our prayers!
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
When Heaven Hears
(I Kings 8:27-40)
Folks like to think that God answers every prayer. The truth is that though God hears every prayer, He doesn’t always answer them. In fact, answered prayer is predicated upon the spiritual condition of the supplicant. In other words, the closer you are to the Lord spiritually, the better the possibility that your prayers will be answered. Some prayers, for example, are “dead in the water” before they’re even spoken. For example, when we pray contrary to the revealed will of God, God will not hear our prayer (I John 5:14). Confidence in prayer comes, in part, from praying according to God’s will as revealed in the Bible.
Solomon recognized that the newly built temple would be a house of prayer. Israel would gather within its precincts to bring their petitions before their God. And God would hear—or reject—their petitions based largely upon the condition of their hearts. According to Solomon, effective praying is dependent upon God’s forgiveness. In other words, the supplicant must first be a penitent, acknowledging personal sinfulness, confessing specific sins, and mournfully repenting of spiritual failure.
Four times in today’s Scripture passage, Solomon prays, “…when thou hearest, forgive” (30, 34, 36, and 39). In other words, forgiveness from God is a necessary prerequisite to approaching Him in prayer. The effectiveness of Israel’s prayers depended first upon their standing with God. Once confession and repentance had taken place, God could forgive and then hear their petitions.
Careless living spawns fruitless praying. Before we rush into God’s presence with our grocery list of desires, we would do well to examine ourselves for unconfessed sins and personal failures. Before asking for things, we should ask for cleansing. Every season of prayer should begin with a I John 1:9 attitude: “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” Once we’re forgiven, Heaven will hear our prayers!
The Reign of King Solomon
First Kings
Monday, August 2, 2010
None Like Him
(I Kings 8:22-26)
Tolerance, political correctness, and ecumenism all conspire to attribute equal virtue to vastly differing positions. Truth, they say, is relative. What’s true for you may not be true for someone else. What’s important is not the factuality of your position; what’s important is that it works for you. Individuality is in—absolutes are out! Of course, this philosophy known as relativism has taken our culture by storm. Today it is tantamount to heresy to proclaim your beliefs superior to those of another. And to assert that someone’s sincerely held position may be wrong, well that’s nothing less than blasphemy!
Solomon, the wisest man in the entire world, had no trouble declaring the superiority—indeed the singularity—of Israel’s God. In the ancient world, many religious options and opinions vied for attention. By today’s standards of tolerance, all would be granted equal legitimacy—no matter how perverse they may have been. Such wasn’t the case in Solomon’s time. Solomon made it clear to his assembled audience that Jehovah, the God of Israel, was the only true God. In fact, Solomon asserted, “there is no god like [him]” (23).
Following his assertion of the greatness of Jehovah above all rivals, Solomon gave a litany of God’s goodness: He keeps His covenants, He is merciful, and He fulfills His words. In other words, the God of the Bible is faithful and has proven Himself so to His people on occasions too numerous to recount.
And, note—if you will—Solomon’s attitude. He had absolutely no regard (at least at this juncture in his life) for other “gods”—opposing belief systems. He didn’t lend them any credence nor give them any quarter. He exalted the God of the Bible alone as worthy of praise! Don’t be bashful about asserting the exclusive claims of Jesus Christ. He alone is God. He alone is to be worshipped. He alone will be Judge. In fact, it wouldn’t hurt to be a little intolerant today! Just kindly tell someone that Jesus is the only way to heaven, and watch the fur fly!
Monday, August 2, 2010
None Like Him
(I Kings 8:22-26)
Tolerance, political correctness, and ecumenism all conspire to attribute equal virtue to vastly differing positions. Truth, they say, is relative. What’s true for you may not be true for someone else. What’s important is not the factuality of your position; what’s important is that it works for you. Individuality is in—absolutes are out! Of course, this philosophy known as relativism has taken our culture by storm. Today it is tantamount to heresy to proclaim your beliefs superior to those of another. And to assert that someone’s sincerely held position may be wrong, well that’s nothing less than blasphemy!
Solomon, the wisest man in the entire world, had no trouble declaring the superiority—indeed the singularity—of Israel’s God. In the ancient world, many religious options and opinions vied for attention. By today’s standards of tolerance, all would be granted equal legitimacy—no matter how perverse they may have been. Such wasn’t the case in Solomon’s time. Solomon made it clear to his assembled audience that Jehovah, the God of Israel, was the only true God. In fact, Solomon asserted, “there is no god like [him]” (23).
Following his assertion of the greatness of Jehovah above all rivals, Solomon gave a litany of God’s goodness: He keeps His covenants, He is merciful, and He fulfills His words. In other words, the God of the Bible is faithful and has proven Himself so to His people on occasions too numerous to recount.
And, note—if you will—Solomon’s attitude. He had absolutely no regard (at least at this juncture in his life) for other “gods”—opposing belief systems. He didn’t lend them any credence nor give them any quarter. He exalted the God of the Bible alone as worthy of praise! Don’t be bashful about asserting the exclusive claims of Jesus Christ. He alone is God. He alone is to be worshipped. He alone will be Judge. In fact, it wouldn’t hurt to be a little intolerant today! Just kindly tell someone that Jesus is the only way to heaven, and watch the fur fly!
The Reign of King Solomon
First Kings
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Good Intentions
(I Kings 8:12-21)
Sometimes good intentions get a bad rap. It’s natural to question the guy who has lots of good goals but never accomplishes anything. Some folks, however, accomplish much and continue to dream bigger dreams. Some of their good intentions may never come to fruition, but some do—and dreams that become reality tend to fuel yet more dreams. A man with a million ideas and some solid accomplishments will go far; a man with no ideas and no accomplishments will go nowhere. Don’t count the dreamer out. If he brought some visions into reality in the past, he’s likely to do it again—on a grander scale than ever before.
David was a big dreamer and a big accomplisher. No sooner had one goal been met than it was replaced by a larger, more aggressive dream. Even when he faced reversals, he never allowed his heart to dream lesser dreams. And all this visionary thinking paid off. David expanded the frontiers of the kingdom well beyond anything known in Saul’s day. He established Jerusalem as the capitol city. After several insurrections, he not only solidified his power, but he became the undisputed monarch of all Israel. Even his personal failures couldn’t stop David from big plans. In fact, his repentance led to renewed vigor in serving the Lord.
One of David’s dearest, most heart-felt dreams was his desire to build a permanent temple for Jehovah. He envisioned a permanent place of worship at Jerusalem that would serve to solidify the nation and testify to the world of Jehovah’s great name (18). David’s temple dream, however, would not be fulfilled. For various reasons, God gave the temple construction oversight to David’s son, Solomon.
Was David’s dream of building the temple a foolish and extravagant vanity on his part? No! In fact the Lord said of David’s dream, “thou didst well that it was in thy heart” (18). In other words, David’s good intentions—though unfulfilled—were good nonetheless. Good intentions without action don’t amount to much. But where good intentions meet with action, something’s bound to happen. Even if you don’t get everything done, at least you get something done—and there’s still a dream or two left for tomorrow!
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Good Intentions
(I Kings 8:12-21)
Sometimes good intentions get a bad rap. It’s natural to question the guy who has lots of good goals but never accomplishes anything. Some folks, however, accomplish much and continue to dream bigger dreams. Some of their good intentions may never come to fruition, but some do—and dreams that become reality tend to fuel yet more dreams. A man with a million ideas and some solid accomplishments will go far; a man with no ideas and no accomplishments will go nowhere. Don’t count the dreamer out. If he brought some visions into reality in the past, he’s likely to do it again—on a grander scale than ever before.
David was a big dreamer and a big accomplisher. No sooner had one goal been met than it was replaced by a larger, more aggressive dream. Even when he faced reversals, he never allowed his heart to dream lesser dreams. And all this visionary thinking paid off. David expanded the frontiers of the kingdom well beyond anything known in Saul’s day. He established Jerusalem as the capitol city. After several insurrections, he not only solidified his power, but he became the undisputed monarch of all Israel. Even his personal failures couldn’t stop David from big plans. In fact, his repentance led to renewed vigor in serving the Lord.
One of David’s dearest, most heart-felt dreams was his desire to build a permanent temple for Jehovah. He envisioned a permanent place of worship at Jerusalem that would serve to solidify the nation and testify to the world of Jehovah’s great name (18). David’s temple dream, however, would not be fulfilled. For various reasons, God gave the temple construction oversight to David’s son, Solomon.
Was David’s dream of building the temple a foolish and extravagant vanity on his part? No! In fact the Lord said of David’s dream, “thou didst well that it was in thy heart” (18). In other words, David’s good intentions—though unfulfilled—were good nonetheless. Good intentions without action don’t amount to much. But where good intentions meet with action, something’s bound to happen. Even if you don’t get everything done, at least you get something done—and there’s still a dream or two left for tomorrow!
Friday, July 2, 2010
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Freedom Threatened from within
(I Kings 1:1-18)
Freedom is under constant threat by the insidious temptation to exchange personal liberty for material prosperity and individual security. With prosperity and an expanding governmental bureaucracy, governments find it necessary to employ more people in the federal effort. More employees and government initiatives mean higher taxes for everyone. America’s tax rates require that citizens work from January 1 through April 9 (99 days—over three months) just to pay their taxes! The average American, therefore, is the veritable slave of the government for over three months out of the year. Government is always expensive, and the citizens always pay.
Solomon’s reign followed the typical pattern. Peace and prosperity brought a burgeoning government with expanding social programs and projects. Today’s reading records Solomon’s correspondence with Hiram, king of Tyre. Solomon was about to embark upon one of the most spectacular building programs of the ancient world, the Jewish Temple at Jerusalem. He needed raw materials and skilled laborers. Hiram had both. Since David had established a good trading relationship with Hiram (II Samuel 5:11), the foreign king was only too happy to continue the exchange with Solomon. Once they struck a bargain, the building could begin.
Notice, however, that all of the laborers were not union workers from Tyre. The Bible says Solomon “raised a levy out of all of Israel” (13). Those words are somewhat euphemistic for “forced labor.” In order to complete the project, Solomon drafted 30,000 men to work for the government, one month out of three—or 4 months per year!
Solomon’s labor requirement was only slightly higher than our own. Remember, Americans work over three months out of the year just to pay for government. And it will only get worse under King Obama. Such policies, as we shall see, multiplied discontent. After Solomon, the nation splintered apart and the glories of the past were only that—glories of the past. Oh, that America would learn from history!
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Freedom Threatened from within
(I Kings 1:1-18)
Freedom is under constant threat by the insidious temptation to exchange personal liberty for material prosperity and individual security. With prosperity and an expanding governmental bureaucracy, governments find it necessary to employ more people in the federal effort. More employees and government initiatives mean higher taxes for everyone. America’s tax rates require that citizens work from January 1 through April 9 (99 days—over three months) just to pay their taxes! The average American, therefore, is the veritable slave of the government for over three months out of the year. Government is always expensive, and the citizens always pay.
Solomon’s reign followed the typical pattern. Peace and prosperity brought a burgeoning government with expanding social programs and projects. Today’s reading records Solomon’s correspondence with Hiram, king of Tyre. Solomon was about to embark upon one of the most spectacular building programs of the ancient world, the Jewish Temple at Jerusalem. He needed raw materials and skilled laborers. Hiram had both. Since David had established a good trading relationship with Hiram (II Samuel 5:11), the foreign king was only too happy to continue the exchange with Solomon. Once they struck a bargain, the building could begin.
Notice, however, that all of the laborers were not union workers from Tyre. The Bible says Solomon “raised a levy out of all of Israel” (13). Those words are somewhat euphemistic for “forced labor.” In order to complete the project, Solomon drafted 30,000 men to work for the government, one month out of three—or 4 months per year!
Solomon’s labor requirement was only slightly higher than our own. Remember, Americans work over three months out of the year just to pay for government. And it will only get worse under King Obama. Such policies, as we shall see, multiplied discontent. After Solomon, the nation splintered apart and the glories of the past were only that—glories of the past. Oh, that America would learn from history!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Friday, July 23, 2010
Truth’s Most Becoming Garb
(I Kings 4:25-34)
Great leaders communicate effectively with their followers. Wise men understand that the simple, unaffected, passionate presentation of an ideal resonates in the hearts of men. Sometimes education itself robs potential leaders of their ability to communicate—which is really the ability to lead. Theological seminaries, for example, frequently pump their young men with ivory tower intellectualism to the point that the common man can no longer understand the sermons. Erudite as they may be, there followers miss the message or are too bored to listen. The disconnect in communication produces malaise in the congregation, and the church never really moves ahead.
Solomon, like all great leaders, understood the importance of connecting with his audience. His reign brought economic prosperity to his people, but he desired something deeper for them (29). As a good leader, he yearned to take his nation beyond material sustenance and border security to experience the richness of their heritage as God’s chosen people. Beyond making a living, Solomon wanted to teach them how to live. And so he began to compile songs and proverbs—a veritable treasure trove of Jewish wisdom and customs—many of which were inspired by the Spirit of God and preserved in our Bibles.
Solomon’s wisdom extended beyond his brian power. Solomon was a wise communicator, speaking the language of the common people. His proverbs were pithy, addressing common objects such as trees, animals, and birds. He used multiple illustrations to drive the truth home. He learned to relate to the problems and plight of the common man. (33). His teaching style was probably very similar to that of Christ.
Interestingly, he never lacked for an audience. People came by the droves to hear him because of his wisdom and because they could understand what he was getting at! Dr. Bob Jones, Sr. used to say, “Simplicity is truth’s most becoming garb.”
Friday, July 23, 2010
Truth’s Most Becoming Garb
(I Kings 4:25-34)
Great leaders communicate effectively with their followers. Wise men understand that the simple, unaffected, passionate presentation of an ideal resonates in the hearts of men. Sometimes education itself robs potential leaders of their ability to communicate—which is really the ability to lead. Theological seminaries, for example, frequently pump their young men with ivory tower intellectualism to the point that the common man can no longer understand the sermons. Erudite as they may be, there followers miss the message or are too bored to listen. The disconnect in communication produces malaise in the congregation, and the church never really moves ahead.
Solomon, like all great leaders, understood the importance of connecting with his audience. His reign brought economic prosperity to his people, but he desired something deeper for them (29). As a good leader, he yearned to take his nation beyond material sustenance and border security to experience the richness of their heritage as God’s chosen people. Beyond making a living, Solomon wanted to teach them how to live. And so he began to compile songs and proverbs—a veritable treasure trove of Jewish wisdom and customs—many of which were inspired by the Spirit of God and preserved in our Bibles.
Solomon’s wisdom extended beyond his brian power. Solomon was a wise communicator, speaking the language of the common people. His proverbs were pithy, addressing common objects such as trees, animals, and birds. He used multiple illustrations to drive the truth home. He learned to relate to the problems and plight of the common man. (33). His teaching style was probably very similar to that of Christ.
Interestingly, he never lacked for an audience. People came by the droves to hear him because of his wisdom and because they could understand what he was getting at! Dr. Bob Jones, Sr. used to say, “Simplicity is truth’s most becoming garb.”
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Many Hands, Light Work
(I Kings 4:1-24)
It’s impossible to do everything yourself. Whether a family, business, church, or school, as an organization grows, the burden of the work must be entrusted to capable workers who will conscientiously accomplish their responsibilities. Without able assistants, no organization can experience prolonged growth and prosperity. Men who refuse to entrust responsibility to others limit their own success. Moses’ father-in-law, for example, wisely counseled him to appoint magistrates who could help carry the load. Even our Lord chose twelve apostles to propagate His work. The New Testament church appointed Deacons to help in bearing the burden. Nothing works better than everyone working together!
Solomon had the wisdom to understand that the nation was rapidly entering a new phase. Saul’s leadership of the fledgling monarchy was primarily defensive. He was always fighting off an external threat. David’s early reign continued that effort, but—having established a system of fortifications from “Dan to Beersheba”—the later part of his reign knew relative peace and prosperity. Solomon was to be the heir of an expanding economy and growing geographic kingdom. In fact, under Solomon Israel was a more powerful nation than Egypt! Given the dramatic growth of the nation, Solomon understood the absolute necessity of organization and delegation (20, 21).
For example, Solomon divided the nation into twelve regions, requiring an official in each region to provide sustenance for the royal house one month out of the year (7). His delegation did not reduce his authority; rather, it multiplied his effectiveness as king (24).
Knowing he couldn’t go it alone, Solomon divided the responsibilities of nationhood, granting real authority to capable officers. As their work prospered, so did the nation. Don’t be a lone wolf! Surround yourself with able men and women who can get the job done. Give them real authority and watch as your work prospers!
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Many Hands, Light Work
(I Kings 4:1-24)
It’s impossible to do everything yourself. Whether a family, business, church, or school, as an organization grows, the burden of the work must be entrusted to capable workers who will conscientiously accomplish their responsibilities. Without able assistants, no organization can experience prolonged growth and prosperity. Men who refuse to entrust responsibility to others limit their own success. Moses’ father-in-law, for example, wisely counseled him to appoint magistrates who could help carry the load. Even our Lord chose twelve apostles to propagate His work. The New Testament church appointed Deacons to help in bearing the burden. Nothing works better than everyone working together!
Solomon had the wisdom to understand that the nation was rapidly entering a new phase. Saul’s leadership of the fledgling monarchy was primarily defensive. He was always fighting off an external threat. David’s early reign continued that effort, but—having established a system of fortifications from “Dan to Beersheba”—the later part of his reign knew relative peace and prosperity. Solomon was to be the heir of an expanding economy and growing geographic kingdom. In fact, under Solomon Israel was a more powerful nation than Egypt! Given the dramatic growth of the nation, Solomon understood the absolute necessity of organization and delegation (20, 21).
For example, Solomon divided the nation into twelve regions, requiring an official in each region to provide sustenance for the royal house one month out of the year (7). His delegation did not reduce his authority; rather, it multiplied his effectiveness as king (24).
Knowing he couldn’t go it alone, Solomon divided the responsibilities of nationhood, granting real authority to capable officers. As their work prospered, so did the nation. Don’t be a lone wolf! Surround yourself with able men and women who can get the job done. Give them real authority and watch as your work prospers!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Thinking Outside the Box
(I Kings 3:16-28)
There’s more than one way to skin a cat. When we face the conundrums of life, it’s good to step back and consider non-conventional solutions. There are some situations that defy personal experience and comparisons to similar circumstances. When these arise, divine wisdom is the only sure guide. Precedent-setting events call for responses directed by the Lord. Nothing short of divine intervention can win the day. Take, for example, the presidency of Ronald Reagan. While reading The Reagan Diaries, I was impressed with his repeated appeal to divine wisdom. Reagan’s burdens had never been born by any man in history. His pressures were unique to his time. He had no clear precedent to follow. He quickly learned to depend upon God.
In answer to Solomon’s request, God bequeathed upon him unique wisdom. Solomon’s method of determining the rightful mother of the child, while unorthodox, produced unquestionably the desired result. Interestingly, he did not focus on the object of the problem (the child) but rather upon the reactions of the women. Most interrogators would have focused on distinguishing physical characteristics in the children. Solomon went to the heart of the matter—the women’s emotional responses. His approach was certainly “outside the box.”
Solomon’s proverbial wisdom was not native to his intellect. It was a gift from God. His abilities were so stunning that the entire nation recognized that “the wisdom of God was with him” (28). In his wisdom, the people saw the Lord.
Christians should, like Solomon of old, demonstrate the Lord’s wisdom to a clueless society. The principles of Scripture, when scrupulously practiced, demonstrate God’s wisdom. Since the Bible addresses every issue of life, we need only turn its pages to find God’s answer to every conceivable problem. The answers are right at our fingertips, on the pages of the Word of God!
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Thinking Outside the Box
(I Kings 3:16-28)
There’s more than one way to skin a cat. When we face the conundrums of life, it’s good to step back and consider non-conventional solutions. There are some situations that defy personal experience and comparisons to similar circumstances. When these arise, divine wisdom is the only sure guide. Precedent-setting events call for responses directed by the Lord. Nothing short of divine intervention can win the day. Take, for example, the presidency of Ronald Reagan. While reading The Reagan Diaries, I was impressed with his repeated appeal to divine wisdom. Reagan’s burdens had never been born by any man in history. His pressures were unique to his time. He had no clear precedent to follow. He quickly learned to depend upon God.
In answer to Solomon’s request, God bequeathed upon him unique wisdom. Solomon’s method of determining the rightful mother of the child, while unorthodox, produced unquestionably the desired result. Interestingly, he did not focus on the object of the problem (the child) but rather upon the reactions of the women. Most interrogators would have focused on distinguishing physical characteristics in the children. Solomon went to the heart of the matter—the women’s emotional responses. His approach was certainly “outside the box.”
Solomon’s proverbial wisdom was not native to his intellect. It was a gift from God. His abilities were so stunning that the entire nation recognized that “the wisdom of God was with him” (28). In his wisdom, the people saw the Lord.
Christians should, like Solomon of old, demonstrate the Lord’s wisdom to a clueless society. The principles of Scripture, when scrupulously practiced, demonstrate God’s wisdom. Since the Bible addresses every issue of life, we need only turn its pages to find God’s answer to every conceivable problem. The answers are right at our fingertips, on the pages of the Word of God!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
The Principal Thing
(I Kings 3:4-15)
Most people hold education in high esteem. Parents plan for their children’s educations from birth—saving money and considering choices. The government spends tens of thousands of dollars on each student it matriculates, unfortunately with dubious results. Some colleges have more applicants than they can possibly enroll. Online schools burgeon with students eager to earn degrees from the privacy of their computer screens. In the “information age,” education is the undisputed key to a good career, lavish salary, and bright future. Or is it?
Solomon understood the difference between knowledge and wisdom. Knowledge addresses the proper comprehension of facts. Knowledge concerns itself with dates, grammar, formulas, and tables. Wisdom, on the other hand, addresses the beneficial use of knowledge. Wisdom goes beyond knowing to applying. But it doesn’t stop there. Wisdom seeks to apply knowledge properly—discerning between right and wrong ways to use knowledge. Knowledge comes from books; but genuine wisdom comes only from God.
The Lord’s offer to Solomon was pretty open-ended: “Ask what I shall give thee” (5). In a sense, God offered Solomon a blank check. The proverbial sky was the limit! The wealth of God was at Solomon’s command! What would he ask?
In a move that surprises most of us, Solomon asked the Lord for one thing: wisdom. He acknowledged his inability to effectively lead such a great people (8, 9). More than anything else, he wanted to do the right thing. God, impressed by his request, gave Solomon wisdom—and everything else, too!
The book of Proverbs calls wisdom the “principal thing” (Prov. 4:7). James encourages us, like Solomon, to ask for wisdom (James 1:5). Education is important; wisdom is priceless! Ask for some today!
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
The Principal Thing
(I Kings 3:4-15)
Most people hold education in high esteem. Parents plan for their children’s educations from birth—saving money and considering choices. The government spends tens of thousands of dollars on each student it matriculates, unfortunately with dubious results. Some colleges have more applicants than they can possibly enroll. Online schools burgeon with students eager to earn degrees from the privacy of their computer screens. In the “information age,” education is the undisputed key to a good career, lavish salary, and bright future. Or is it?
Solomon understood the difference between knowledge and wisdom. Knowledge addresses the proper comprehension of facts. Knowledge concerns itself with dates, grammar, formulas, and tables. Wisdom, on the other hand, addresses the beneficial use of knowledge. Wisdom goes beyond knowing to applying. But it doesn’t stop there. Wisdom seeks to apply knowledge properly—discerning between right and wrong ways to use knowledge. Knowledge comes from books; but genuine wisdom comes only from God.
The Lord’s offer to Solomon was pretty open-ended: “Ask what I shall give thee” (5). In a sense, God offered Solomon a blank check. The proverbial sky was the limit! The wealth of God was at Solomon’s command! What would he ask?
In a move that surprises most of us, Solomon asked the Lord for one thing: wisdom. He acknowledged his inability to effectively lead such a great people (8, 9). More than anything else, he wanted to do the right thing. God, impressed by his request, gave Solomon wisdom—and everything else, too!
The book of Proverbs calls wisdom the “principal thing” (Prov. 4:7). James encourages us, like Solomon, to ask for wisdom (James 1:5). Education is important; wisdom is priceless! Ask for some today!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Monday, July 19, 2010
Seeds of Apostasy
(I Kings 3:1-3)
Sincerity is not the highest form of fealty to God. Many a sincere man has been wrong—sincerely wrong. Sincerity is not enough to overcome the corruptive influences of error. It is possible to have a genuine relationship with God and still fall prey to compromise. Even love for Christ is not enough to safeguard against encroaching apostasy. The best way to preserve the purity of the faith is through exacting obedience. Nothing can take the place of simply obeying the commands of God. Evangelicalism at large is never short on accolades for God (He’s “awesome!”), but evangelicalism comes up short on obedience. And it’s disobedience that damns.
Solomon was as sincere as could be. His reign saw the completion of Jerusalem’s magnificent temple, the city walls, and the king’s palace. His foreign policy accomplished a feat unparalleled in history: He married a Pharaoh’s daughter (1). In addition, Solomon “loved the Lord’ (3). No one doubted the sincerity of his religious profession. He was true-blue in his Jewish affections. Not only that, but he honored the memory of his father. He took his father’s advice to heart and walked after David’s statutes. He was on the fast track to success!
Almost as an aside note, however, the Bible mentions one seemingly minor flaw: Though Solomon had built the temple, he continued in the habit of worshipping Jehovah in the “high places.” Local altars were used to worship Jehovah as well as other heathen gods. Solomon, as well as the people, continued this practice in disobedience to God (Deut. 12:1-7).
Solomon’s “little” disobedience would have major consequences. Eventually, worship at the “high places” so dulled his spiritual senses that he apostatized. He built pagan altars for vile deities, including Molech (I Kings 11: 7, 8). Sincerity is good, but obedience is better. Only exacting obedience to the Word of God insures against the ever-prevailing winds of apostasy.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Seeds of Apostasy
(I Kings 3:1-3)
Sincerity is not the highest form of fealty to God. Many a sincere man has been wrong—sincerely wrong. Sincerity is not enough to overcome the corruptive influences of error. It is possible to have a genuine relationship with God and still fall prey to compromise. Even love for Christ is not enough to safeguard against encroaching apostasy. The best way to preserve the purity of the faith is through exacting obedience. Nothing can take the place of simply obeying the commands of God. Evangelicalism at large is never short on accolades for God (He’s “awesome!”), but evangelicalism comes up short on obedience. And it’s disobedience that damns.
Solomon was as sincere as could be. His reign saw the completion of Jerusalem’s magnificent temple, the city walls, and the king’s palace. His foreign policy accomplished a feat unparalleled in history: He married a Pharaoh’s daughter (1). In addition, Solomon “loved the Lord’ (3). No one doubted the sincerity of his religious profession. He was true-blue in his Jewish affections. Not only that, but he honored the memory of his father. He took his father’s advice to heart and walked after David’s statutes. He was on the fast track to success!
Almost as an aside note, however, the Bible mentions one seemingly minor flaw: Though Solomon had built the temple, he continued in the habit of worshipping Jehovah in the “high places.” Local altars were used to worship Jehovah as well as other heathen gods. Solomon, as well as the people, continued this practice in disobedience to God (Deut. 12:1-7).
Solomon’s “little” disobedience would have major consequences. Eventually, worship at the “high places” so dulled his spiritual senses that he apostatized. He built pagan altars for vile deities, including Molech (I Kings 11: 7, 8). Sincerity is good, but obedience is better. Only exacting obedience to the Word of God insures against the ever-prevailing winds of apostasy.
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Commitment Is the Issue
(I Kings 2:35-46)
People break agreements far too easily in our day. Many rationalize their breaches of confidence by assessing the importance of the agreement. If the agreement is seemingly insignificant, they feel no compulsion to keep their word. If, for example, they have made lunch plans but later get a “better offer,” they will without conscience call to cancel the first appointment. One justification leads to another, and those who lightly esteem their own word find themselves breaking it more frequently. Little agreements broken always lead to the negotiability of larger agreements. Eventually, no commitment—not even the vows of marriage—is inviolable.
Shimei had spent much of his life skating on thin ice. Faithful readers will recall the “episode” in which he cursed David as the king fled Jerusalem during Absalom’s rebellion. When David was finally restored, Shimei made an uneasy peace with the offended monarch. David, however, never fully trusted him again; and he advised Solomon to dispatch him to eternity as soon as possible.
In his wisdom, Solomon knew he couldn’t just execute Shimei outright. He also knew he couldn’t trust Shimei to do the right thing. So, Solomon made a gentleman’s agreement with Shimei. The terms were simple: Shimei was to build a house in Jerusalem, live there, and never venture outside of the city. Shimei eagerly agreed to the terms. He made a commitment.
Shimei kept his word to Solomon until the agreement became an inconvenience. His escaped slaves provided what little justification he needed to break his word. He left Jerusalem in search of the runaways, breaking his agreement with Solomon. Shimei met with the executioner’s sword when Solomon found out about his weekend getaway. One shouldn’t violate his word. Even insignificant commitments should be studiously kept. A commitment is a commitment, and commitment is the issue!
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Commitment Is the Issue
(I Kings 2:35-46)
People break agreements far too easily in our day. Many rationalize their breaches of confidence by assessing the importance of the agreement. If the agreement is seemingly insignificant, they feel no compulsion to keep their word. If, for example, they have made lunch plans but later get a “better offer,” they will without conscience call to cancel the first appointment. One justification leads to another, and those who lightly esteem their own word find themselves breaking it more frequently. Little agreements broken always lead to the negotiability of larger agreements. Eventually, no commitment—not even the vows of marriage—is inviolable.
Shimei had spent much of his life skating on thin ice. Faithful readers will recall the “episode” in which he cursed David as the king fled Jerusalem during Absalom’s rebellion. When David was finally restored, Shimei made an uneasy peace with the offended monarch. David, however, never fully trusted him again; and he advised Solomon to dispatch him to eternity as soon as possible.
In his wisdom, Solomon knew he couldn’t just execute Shimei outright. He also knew he couldn’t trust Shimei to do the right thing. So, Solomon made a gentleman’s agreement with Shimei. The terms were simple: Shimei was to build a house in Jerusalem, live there, and never venture outside of the city. Shimei eagerly agreed to the terms. He made a commitment.
Shimei kept his word to Solomon until the agreement became an inconvenience. His escaped slaves provided what little justification he needed to break his word. He left Jerusalem in search of the runaways, breaking his agreement with Solomon. Shimei met with the executioner’s sword when Solomon found out about his weekend getaway. One shouldn’t violate his word. Even insignificant commitments should be studiously kept. A commitment is a commitment, and commitment is the issue!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Saturday, July 17, 2010
Getting Religion: a Last Resort
(I Kings 2:28-34)
For some people, God becomes the court of last resort. They wander recklessly through life with nary a consideration for Christ in the world. They neglect the Bible, avoid the church, and rear their children as veritable heathen. “No time for religion,” they glibly say. They drink, party, carouse, and blaspheme without any concern for higher principles. A bumper sticker summed up their secular philosophy: “I believe in life; not afterlife.” With pseudo-intellectual argumentation these secularist lemmings dance carelessly on toward the brink of the Christless chasm of eternity—until the moment comes when they need God.
Joab’s life followed essentially the secularist mentality so prevalent today. David, to be sure, had a genuine relationship with the Lord. While he was far from perfect, David knew fellowship with God. He was a spiritual man. His spiritual sided guided him on most occasions. No one ever questioned David’s sincerity or his ultimate commitment to the Lord. Joab, David’s commanding general, was different. Scripture pictures him as a brilliant military strategist, but not as a spiritual man. He played hardball office politics with the best of them, but he never put his neck on the line for the Lord. For the greater part of his life, he was loyal to David; but he never came to believe in a cause bigger than himself. He was a classic, self-made, self-preserved, secular man—until he really needed God.
Upon hearing of Abiathar’s fate, Joab knew his goose was finally cooked—unless God intervened. So, having nowhere else to turn, he threw himself upon the altar and hoped for a miracle of mercy (28). It’s no surprise, however, that his miracle didn’t come. He had ignored God throughout life, and getting religion at the very end wouldn’t change that. If you’ve generally ignored God in your life, don’t expect Him to “drop everything” at your beck and call. Christ should be our first priority, not our last resort.
Saturday, July 17, 2010
Getting Religion: a Last Resort
(I Kings 2:28-34)
For some people, God becomes the court of last resort. They wander recklessly through life with nary a consideration for Christ in the world. They neglect the Bible, avoid the church, and rear their children as veritable heathen. “No time for religion,” they glibly say. They drink, party, carouse, and blaspheme without any concern for higher principles. A bumper sticker summed up their secular philosophy: “I believe in life; not afterlife.” With pseudo-intellectual argumentation these secularist lemmings dance carelessly on toward the brink of the Christless chasm of eternity—until the moment comes when they need God.
Joab’s life followed essentially the secularist mentality so prevalent today. David, to be sure, had a genuine relationship with the Lord. While he was far from perfect, David knew fellowship with God. He was a spiritual man. His spiritual sided guided him on most occasions. No one ever questioned David’s sincerity or his ultimate commitment to the Lord. Joab, David’s commanding general, was different. Scripture pictures him as a brilliant military strategist, but not as a spiritual man. He played hardball office politics with the best of them, but he never put his neck on the line for the Lord. For the greater part of his life, he was loyal to David; but he never came to believe in a cause bigger than himself. He was a classic, self-made, self-preserved, secular man—until he really needed God.
Upon hearing of Abiathar’s fate, Joab knew his goose was finally cooked—unless God intervened. So, having nowhere else to turn, he threw himself upon the altar and hoped for a miracle of mercy (28). It’s no surprise, however, that his miracle didn’t come. He had ignored God throughout life, and getting religion at the very end wouldn’t change that. If you’ve generally ignored God in your life, don’t expect Him to “drop everything” at your beck and call. Christ should be our first priority, not our last resort.
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Friday, July 16, 2010
Numbered Days
(I Kings 2:26, 27)
“Your days are numbered!” mother used to exclaim in exasperation. What she meant was that misbehavior would one day get its punishment. Punishment might not be immediate, but there would be a definite day of reckoning. My day of reckoning usually came when father returned home from work. Punishment, though delayed, was always certain. Delay never deceived me into thinking that I was somehow in the clear for my misdeeds. The passing of time was no assurance of clemency. Hearing the words “Your days are numbered” from my mother was more like a death sentence!
God had previously made such an announcement to the house of Eli the priest (I Samuel 2:27-36). Eli, you will recall, had indulged his sons in preference above the commandments of the Lord. Their vile behavior finally brought the Lord’s judgment upon Eli and his descendents. As far as the priestly office was concerned, the house of Eli was serving on borrowed time. Their days were numbered.
Interestingly, God’s pronouncement to Eli did not fully come to pass in his lifetime. Indeed, years passed without any evident fulfillment of God’s promise. Perhaps Eli’s descendents had become comfortable in their offices, believing that the prophet’s message to Eli must somehow have been mistaken. Maybe, they reasoned, God had changed His mind.
When the blow finally fell, it fell decisively. Solomon believed Adonijah’s request for Abishag was part of a larger conspiracy (22). Accordingly, he expelled Abiathar from the priesthood, ending forever the priestly service of the house of Eli—just as the Lord had promised.
Judgment delayed is not judgment forgotten. Sooner or later, sin always has its consequences. Don’t lull yourself into a false sense of security just because your sins do not come under God’s immediate scrutiny. If you sin and don’t get it right, your days are numbered!
Friday, July 16, 2010
Numbered Days
(I Kings 2:26, 27)
“Your days are numbered!” mother used to exclaim in exasperation. What she meant was that misbehavior would one day get its punishment. Punishment might not be immediate, but there would be a definite day of reckoning. My day of reckoning usually came when father returned home from work. Punishment, though delayed, was always certain. Delay never deceived me into thinking that I was somehow in the clear for my misdeeds. The passing of time was no assurance of clemency. Hearing the words “Your days are numbered” from my mother was more like a death sentence!
God had previously made such an announcement to the house of Eli the priest (I Samuel 2:27-36). Eli, you will recall, had indulged his sons in preference above the commandments of the Lord. Their vile behavior finally brought the Lord’s judgment upon Eli and his descendents. As far as the priestly office was concerned, the house of Eli was serving on borrowed time. Their days were numbered.
Interestingly, God’s pronouncement to Eli did not fully come to pass in his lifetime. Indeed, years passed without any evident fulfillment of God’s promise. Perhaps Eli’s descendents had become comfortable in their offices, believing that the prophet’s message to Eli must somehow have been mistaken. Maybe, they reasoned, God had changed His mind.
When the blow finally fell, it fell decisively. Solomon believed Adonijah’s request for Abishag was part of a larger conspiracy (22). Accordingly, he expelled Abiathar from the priesthood, ending forever the priestly service of the house of Eli—just as the Lord had promised.
Judgment delayed is not judgment forgotten. Sooner or later, sin always has its consequences. Don’t lull yourself into a false sense of security just because your sins do not come under God’s immediate scrutiny. If you sin and don’t get it right, your days are numbered!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Leave “Well Enough” Alone!
(I Kings 2:10-25)
When we are the grateful recipients of another’s mercy, wisdom dictates a change in our course of actions, lest we repeat the previous mistake and offend our benefactor anew. Though Jesus commanded us to forgive an offender “seventy times seven,” we rarely receive unbridled mercy on the second offense. Presuming upon the mercy of another is dangerous business. Rather than risk again offending an appeased brother, it is best to change our actions and attitudes. Upon securing his mercy for the first offense, we should leave “well enough” alone by avoiding any possible repeat of the offending circumstances.
Adonijah simply didn’t know when to quit. Having failed in his overt attempt to seize David’s throne, he decided upon a more subtle course of action to gain standing in the royal court. He approached Bathsheba, the Queen Mother, with what appeared to her to be an innocuous request: He wanted to marry Abishag, David’s former nurse.
Apparently Bathsheba didn’t realize the implications of the request. Though David had not engaged in sexual relations with Abishag, she was still numbered among his concubines. In the culture of that day, a king’s harem was the sole property of the king and, following his death, of his rightful heir. Faithful readers will recall that Absalom’s consorting with his father’s concubines was, essentially, a claim to the throne (II Samuel 16:21, 22). Adonijah’s request was tantamount to the same.
Bathsheba, presumably in good faith, brought Adonijah’s request before Solomon. Solomon recognized the request for what it was: subtle sedition. And, in keeping his word to Adonijah, Solomon immediately had him slain (25 and 1:52).
Adonijah didn’t have to die. He could have simply left “well enough” alone. Because he didn’t know when to quit, he paid the ultimate price. Think before you act, and recognize when “well enough” is forever enough.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Leave “Well Enough” Alone!
(I Kings 2:10-25)
When we are the grateful recipients of another’s mercy, wisdom dictates a change in our course of actions, lest we repeat the previous mistake and offend our benefactor anew. Though Jesus commanded us to forgive an offender “seventy times seven,” we rarely receive unbridled mercy on the second offense. Presuming upon the mercy of another is dangerous business. Rather than risk again offending an appeased brother, it is best to change our actions and attitudes. Upon securing his mercy for the first offense, we should leave “well enough” alone by avoiding any possible repeat of the offending circumstances.
Adonijah simply didn’t know when to quit. Having failed in his overt attempt to seize David’s throne, he decided upon a more subtle course of action to gain standing in the royal court. He approached Bathsheba, the Queen Mother, with what appeared to her to be an innocuous request: He wanted to marry Abishag, David’s former nurse.
Apparently Bathsheba didn’t realize the implications of the request. Though David had not engaged in sexual relations with Abishag, she was still numbered among his concubines. In the culture of that day, a king’s harem was the sole property of the king and, following his death, of his rightful heir. Faithful readers will recall that Absalom’s consorting with his father’s concubines was, essentially, a claim to the throne (II Samuel 16:21, 22). Adonijah’s request was tantamount to the same.
Bathsheba, presumably in good faith, brought Adonijah’s request before Solomon. Solomon recognized the request for what it was: subtle sedition. And, in keeping his word to Adonijah, Solomon immediately had him slain (25 and 1:52).
Adonijah didn’t have to die. He could have simply left “well enough” alone. Because he didn’t know when to quit, he paid the ultimate price. Think before you act, and recognize when “well enough” is forever enough.
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Payday Someday
(I Kings 2:5-9)
The Bible speaks of the law of sowing and reaping (Galatians 6:8). Or, as grandma used to say, “You reap what you sow.” Actions, even things long ago forgotten, often make their haunting return at moments least expected. From a positive perspective, however, things done in kindness often reap a future reward—sometimes years after the fact. Whether negative or positive, the principle stands: You reap as you sow. And, though it’s sometimes delayed by years, there is a payday someday.
In his instructions to Solomon, David felt constrained to bring up unfinished business he had with several members of his court. Though Joab had been an excellent military commander and at times a good confidant, he had proven unnecessarily violent, jealous, and—in later years—disloyal. Remember, he had murdered Absalom (II Samuel 18:14), Amasa (II Samuel 20:8-10) and Abner (II Samuel 3:27). He had also supported Adonijah in his failed bid for the throne. Because he had proven himself homicidal and untrustworthy, David advised Solomon to bring about his untimely demise (6). Joab’s actions would come back to haunt him years later!
On a positive note, David advised Solomon to continue rewarding the loyalty of Barzillai, the man who had provided for David during his exile from the throne. Barzillai’s kindness, therefore, would come back to reward him years after the fact.
But then there was the foul-mouthed Shimei. Initially shown mercy, David counseled Solomon to deal with him. Obviously David feared that Shimei’s unpredictable nature could endanger Solomon’s reign. After all, “loose lips sink ships.” Shimei’s hasty words would come back to haunt him years after they were spoken.
You can’t thwart the principle of sowing and reaping. You can’t “sow your wild oats” and simultaneously pray for crop failure. Mama used to say, “What goes around comes around.” She was right! Make sure what “goes around” is positive, so it can come back to you the same way!
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Payday Someday
(I Kings 2:5-9)
The Bible speaks of the law of sowing and reaping (Galatians 6:8). Or, as grandma used to say, “You reap what you sow.” Actions, even things long ago forgotten, often make their haunting return at moments least expected. From a positive perspective, however, things done in kindness often reap a future reward—sometimes years after the fact. Whether negative or positive, the principle stands: You reap as you sow. And, though it’s sometimes delayed by years, there is a payday someday.
In his instructions to Solomon, David felt constrained to bring up unfinished business he had with several members of his court. Though Joab had been an excellent military commander and at times a good confidant, he had proven unnecessarily violent, jealous, and—in later years—disloyal. Remember, he had murdered Absalom (II Samuel 18:14), Amasa (II Samuel 20:8-10) and Abner (II Samuel 3:27). He had also supported Adonijah in his failed bid for the throne. Because he had proven himself homicidal and untrustworthy, David advised Solomon to bring about his untimely demise (6). Joab’s actions would come back to haunt him years later!
On a positive note, David advised Solomon to continue rewarding the loyalty of Barzillai, the man who had provided for David during his exile from the throne. Barzillai’s kindness, therefore, would come back to reward him years after the fact.
But then there was the foul-mouthed Shimei. Initially shown mercy, David counseled Solomon to deal with him. Obviously David feared that Shimei’s unpredictable nature could endanger Solomon’s reign. After all, “loose lips sink ships.” Shimei’s hasty words would come back to haunt him years after they were spoken.
You can’t thwart the principle of sowing and reaping. You can’t “sow your wild oats” and simultaneously pray for crop failure. Mama used to say, “What goes around comes around.” She was right! Make sure what “goes around” is positive, so it can come back to you the same way!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Be a Man!
(I Kings 2:1-4)
History attaches great importance to the last words of a man. Some men utter significant statements as they slip into eternity. D.L. Moody, for example, is said to have proclaimed, “Heaven is opening and God is calling me!” Others, sadly, have screamed in terror, flailing their arms to avert a burning sensation. Some record their final words in a document or set of instructions. Often, those who have built large personal empires leave detailed instructions as to how their survivors should carry on after their demise. David, Israel’s greatest king, left such instructions to his son Solomon; and they’re recorded in the Bible.
Notice David’s immediate command to Solomon: “Be thou strong…and show thyself a man” (2). David wasn’t concerned that Solomon might show too much emotion at the funeral. Rather, David was concerned with Solomon’s conduct as king. In the verses that follow, David gives specific instruction emphasizing the spiritual principles of godly leadership. David, therefore, defined manliness in spiritual and theological terms.
Manliness, David insists, is essentialy obedience. He told Solomon to “keep the charge of the Lord thy God” (3). In other words, Solomon was to know and obey God’s commands. Leaders, David had painfully learned, are not above the law of God. In fact, the consequences of disobedience for kings were far more severe than those for common people. Above all, Solomon was to consider God’s commands and follow them to the best of his ability. Such obedience demonstrates manliness unmatched by any arm wrestling competition.
On Solomon’s obedience hinged the continuity of the Davidic throne (4). God would keep His promise to David regarding a perpetual throne; but a physically reigning occupant depended upon obedience. The great test of Solomon’s reign would be his dedication to God’s Word. May we understand the same test of manliness is ours today!
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Be a Man!
(I Kings 2:1-4)
History attaches great importance to the last words of a man. Some men utter significant statements as they slip into eternity. D.L. Moody, for example, is said to have proclaimed, “Heaven is opening and God is calling me!” Others, sadly, have screamed in terror, flailing their arms to avert a burning sensation. Some record their final words in a document or set of instructions. Often, those who have built large personal empires leave detailed instructions as to how their survivors should carry on after their demise. David, Israel’s greatest king, left such instructions to his son Solomon; and they’re recorded in the Bible.
Notice David’s immediate command to Solomon: “Be thou strong…and show thyself a man” (2). David wasn’t concerned that Solomon might show too much emotion at the funeral. Rather, David was concerned with Solomon’s conduct as king. In the verses that follow, David gives specific instruction emphasizing the spiritual principles of godly leadership. David, therefore, defined manliness in spiritual and theological terms.
Manliness, David insists, is essentialy obedience. He told Solomon to “keep the charge of the Lord thy God” (3). In other words, Solomon was to know and obey God’s commands. Leaders, David had painfully learned, are not above the law of God. In fact, the consequences of disobedience for kings were far more severe than those for common people. Above all, Solomon was to consider God’s commands and follow them to the best of his ability. Such obedience demonstrates manliness unmatched by any arm wrestling competition.
On Solomon’s obedience hinged the continuity of the Davidic throne (4). God would keep His promise to David regarding a perpetual throne; but a physically reigning occupant depended upon obedience. The great test of Solomon’s reign would be his dedication to God’s Word. May we understand the same test of manliness is ours today!
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Monday, July 12, 2010
Give a Guy a Break
(I Kings 1:41-53)
Not infrequently, people do stupid things. Actions stem from either character or impulse—sometimes both. When a given behavior is “out of character” for a particular individual, it is probable he was acting on impulse. Impulsive actions, more likely than not, are stupid. Every one of us knows it’s true, because we’ve all been there! And in the moment of regret when we feel the hot blush of shame, we only hope that others will overlook our foolishness. With any luck our impulsive acts will be quickly forgiven and forgotten. At least that’s our prayer!
Adonijah’s actions probably stemmed from both character and impulse. As previously noted, he had been so indulged by his father David as to corrupt his integrity. Used to getting anything he wanted, he rushed headlong into a campaign to seize the throne. He even managed to entice others to follow his misguided scheme. In fact, Adonijah’s self-proclaimed coronation banquet included a star-studded lineup of some of Israel’s most respected leaders, Joab and Abiathar among them.
All was going swimmingly at the party until Jonathan, Abiathar’s son, informed the gathering that Solomon had just assumed David’s throne and was reigning as king (43). For Adonijah this was indeed a “Maalox moment!” Suddenly, all of his guests remembered prior commitments. As they quickly exited the banquet hall, Adonijah watched his aspirations melt like snow under the hot son. He also realized his impulsive actions (born of flawed character) now threatened his life.
Adonijah, we’re told, “arose, and went, and caught hold on the horns of the altar” (49). In other words, he pled for mercy for his impulsive actions. And, graciously, Solomon granted clemency—under one condition: that Adonijah learn to behave himself (52). Solomon’s gracious actions contain a lesson: Give folks a break. Since we’re all guilty of occasional stupidity, it’s good sometimes to look the other way when someone “acts the fool” and recognizes it.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Give a Guy a Break
(I Kings 1:41-53)
Not infrequently, people do stupid things. Actions stem from either character or impulse—sometimes both. When a given behavior is “out of character” for a particular individual, it is probable he was acting on impulse. Impulsive actions, more likely than not, are stupid. Every one of us knows it’s true, because we’ve all been there! And in the moment of regret when we feel the hot blush of shame, we only hope that others will overlook our foolishness. With any luck our impulsive acts will be quickly forgiven and forgotten. At least that’s our prayer!
Adonijah’s actions probably stemmed from both character and impulse. As previously noted, he had been so indulged by his father David as to corrupt his integrity. Used to getting anything he wanted, he rushed headlong into a campaign to seize the throne. He even managed to entice others to follow his misguided scheme. In fact, Adonijah’s self-proclaimed coronation banquet included a star-studded lineup of some of Israel’s most respected leaders, Joab and Abiathar among them.
All was going swimmingly at the party until Jonathan, Abiathar’s son, informed the gathering that Solomon had just assumed David’s throne and was reigning as king (43). For Adonijah this was indeed a “Maalox moment!” Suddenly, all of his guests remembered prior commitments. As they quickly exited the banquet hall, Adonijah watched his aspirations melt like snow under the hot son. He also realized his impulsive actions (born of flawed character) now threatened his life.
Adonijah, we’re told, “arose, and went, and caught hold on the horns of the altar” (49). In other words, he pled for mercy for his impulsive actions. And, graciously, Solomon granted clemency—under one condition: that Adonijah learn to behave himself (52). Solomon’s gracious actions contain a lesson: Give folks a break. Since we’re all guilty of occasional stupidity, it’s good sometimes to look the other way when someone “acts the fool” and recognizes it.
The Reign of Solomon
First Kings
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Instinctive Leadership
(I Kings 1:31-40)
At times, decisive action means the difference between crisis and calm. When one has the luxury of studying his options, he should do so. In times of urgency and distress, however, it is often necessary to act quickly—sometimes from “gut instinct” alone. There are moments when indecision, vacillation, and hesitancy cost too much to entertain. Delay can be deadly. While studied wisdom is admirable, instinctive leadership frequently wins the day when time is of the essence. Entire wars have been one on instinct alone.
David had become a man of instinctive leadership. Such ability is not an arbitrary gift of nature. Rather, David learned principles from the sum of his experiences. For example, he had been down the road of attempted sedition on several occasions. He knew from experience what was necessary at that very moment. David’s confidence in the crisis came from his experience in handling many such debacles in life. Don’t disparage your circumstances! God may be preparing you for greater leadership.
Secondly, David’s instinctive leadership stemmed from his understanding of human nature. Throughout his life, David was a master at winning hearts. He knew what people longed for; and he delivered. Even in the succession crisis, David understood the symbolic importance of both prophet and priest anointing Solomon (32-34). It would take more than David’s word to install the new king. Solomon needed the backing of the most respected spiritual leaders in the realm.
Most importantly, David and his loyal followers led with the conviction that they were doing God’s will (35-37). For the Christian, “instinct” could better be described as the leading of the Spirit of God (Rom. 8:14). While studied responses are optimum, instinctual leadership frequently wins in a crisis. Learn, at least in part, to lead from your “gut.”
Sunday, July 11, 2010
Instinctive Leadership
(I Kings 1:31-40)
At times, decisive action means the difference between crisis and calm. When one has the luxury of studying his options, he should do so. In times of urgency and distress, however, it is often necessary to act quickly—sometimes from “gut instinct” alone. There are moments when indecision, vacillation, and hesitancy cost too much to entertain. Delay can be deadly. While studied wisdom is admirable, instinctive leadership frequently wins the day when time is of the essence. Entire wars have been one on instinct alone.
David had become a man of instinctive leadership. Such ability is not an arbitrary gift of nature. Rather, David learned principles from the sum of his experiences. For example, he had been down the road of attempted sedition on several occasions. He knew from experience what was necessary at that very moment. David’s confidence in the crisis came from his experience in handling many such debacles in life. Don’t disparage your circumstances! God may be preparing you for greater leadership.
Secondly, David’s instinctive leadership stemmed from his understanding of human nature. Throughout his life, David was a master at winning hearts. He knew what people longed for; and he delivered. Even in the succession crisis, David understood the symbolic importance of both prophet and priest anointing Solomon (32-34). It would take more than David’s word to install the new king. Solomon needed the backing of the most respected spiritual leaders in the realm.
Most importantly, David and his loyal followers led with the conviction that they were doing God’s will (35-37). For the Christian, “instinct” could better be described as the leading of the Spirit of God (Rom. 8:14). While studied responses are optimum, instinctual leadership frequently wins in a crisis. Learn, at least in part, to lead from your “gut.”
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 7
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Trouble on Steroids
(I Samuel 17:1-14)
“Into every life some rain must fall.” So goes the old saying, assuring us that trouble is the sure inheritance of the human race. Troubles, however, come in different sizes. The daily “mist” of interruptions, delays, and minor frustrations pales in comparison to the periodic hurricanes of job upheaval, serious illness, and unexpected death. Today’s passage records Israel’s confrontation with trouble on steroids.
The Philistines suffered significant losses in their defeat at Michmash (14:31). Unwilling to risk another debilitating military debacle, they engaged Israel in a challenge known as representative battle. Such a battle, not uncommon in the near east, involved opposing sides each choosing a warrior as a representative. The agreement, outlined in verses 8 and 9, is typical of such military arrangements.
The Philistine champion, Goliath of Gath, was formidable indeed! Standing at 9 feet, six inches, he was definitely head and shoulders above the rest. Likely, Goliath was descended from the giant sons of Anak who lived in the southwest corner of Palestine (Joshua 11:22). Whatever his origin, Goliath represented a significant challenge to Israel. To make matters worse, his continual taunting (10) inspired fear in Israel’s fighting forces. Any resolve they had possessed melted away in the presence of the savage Philistine warrior (11).
Israel’s response, however, was unfounded. God had already proven Himself to be Israel’s champion. Perhaps Saul’s instability caused his men to doubt, but God Himself had never failed. In fact, trouble on steroids would provide an opportunity for God to show Himself mighty on the behalf of His people. Say, maybe that’s why you’re facing such monumental problems. Maybe God wants to prove Himself to you!
Trouble on Steroids
(I Samuel 17:1-14)
“Into every life some rain must fall.” So goes the old saying, assuring us that trouble is the sure inheritance of the human race. Troubles, however, come in different sizes. The daily “mist” of interruptions, delays, and minor frustrations pales in comparison to the periodic hurricanes of job upheaval, serious illness, and unexpected death. Today’s passage records Israel’s confrontation with trouble on steroids.
The Philistines suffered significant losses in their defeat at Michmash (14:31). Unwilling to risk another debilitating military debacle, they engaged Israel in a challenge known as representative battle. Such a battle, not uncommon in the near east, involved opposing sides each choosing a warrior as a representative. The agreement, outlined in verses 8 and 9, is typical of such military arrangements.
The Philistine champion, Goliath of Gath, was formidable indeed! Standing at 9 feet, six inches, he was definitely head and shoulders above the rest. Likely, Goliath was descended from the giant sons of Anak who lived in the southwest corner of Palestine (Joshua 11:22). Whatever his origin, Goliath represented a significant challenge to Israel. To make matters worse, his continual taunting (10) inspired fear in Israel’s fighting forces. Any resolve they had possessed melted away in the presence of the savage Philistine warrior (11).
Israel’s response, however, was unfounded. God had already proven Himself to be Israel’s champion. Perhaps Saul’s instability caused his men to doubt, but God Himself had never failed. In fact, trouble on steroids would provide an opportunity for God to show Himself mighty on the behalf of His people. Say, maybe that’s why you’re facing such monumental problems. Maybe God wants to prove Himself to you!
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 6
Friday, March 5, 2010
Attitude Adjustment
(I Samuel 16:14-23)
Attitude has a bearing on everything in life. From simple, temporary depression to deep-seated psychosis, mental and emotional disturbances can cripple otherwise healthy, intelligent individuals. Compounded with spiritual dearth, a bad attitude can lead to uncharacteristic negative behavior. From the time of his rejection from the kingship, Saul’s emotional life began a downward spiral that would ultimately result in his personal destruction.
In today’s passage we meet with an interesting declaration. Speaking of Saul, the Bible says, “…an evil spirit from the Lord troubled him.” Some commentators have imagined that this is a reference to demonic possession. While the departing of the Spirit of the Lord certainly opened Saul to demonic influences, it is probably better to view the “evil spirit from the Lord” as a spirit of discontent, depression, discouragement—simply put, as a bad attitude. Judges 9:23 records similarly that God “sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem…”
Whatever the source, Saul’s attitude would frequently dip to unreasoning rages, fits of terror, and even homicidal violence. As the years rolled on, his manic depression increased with fewer prolonged periods of mental stability. History records that many great leaders suffered bouts of depression. Winston Churchill frequently referred to depression as a “black dog” that would sometimes come to visit him. Saul’s depression, however, interfered with his duties as king.
Interestingly, the only antidote for Saul’s bad attitude—at least early on—was David’s musical ability. And, providentially God used David’s talent—and Saul’s bad attitude—to position young David in the palace of the king. Even bad attitudes can’t thwart God! And Saul’s sour disposition became David’s open door.
Attitude Adjustment
(I Samuel 16:14-23)
Attitude has a bearing on everything in life. From simple, temporary depression to deep-seated psychosis, mental and emotional disturbances can cripple otherwise healthy, intelligent individuals. Compounded with spiritual dearth, a bad attitude can lead to uncharacteristic negative behavior. From the time of his rejection from the kingship, Saul’s emotional life began a downward spiral that would ultimately result in his personal destruction.
In today’s passage we meet with an interesting declaration. Speaking of Saul, the Bible says, “…an evil spirit from the Lord troubled him.” Some commentators have imagined that this is a reference to demonic possession. While the departing of the Spirit of the Lord certainly opened Saul to demonic influences, it is probably better to view the “evil spirit from the Lord” as a spirit of discontent, depression, discouragement—simply put, as a bad attitude. Judges 9:23 records similarly that God “sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem…”
Whatever the source, Saul’s attitude would frequently dip to unreasoning rages, fits of terror, and even homicidal violence. As the years rolled on, his manic depression increased with fewer prolonged periods of mental stability. History records that many great leaders suffered bouts of depression. Winston Churchill frequently referred to depression as a “black dog” that would sometimes come to visit him. Saul’s depression, however, interfered with his duties as king.
Interestingly, the only antidote for Saul’s bad attitude—at least early on—was David’s musical ability. And, providentially God used David’s talent—and Saul’s bad attitude—to position young David in the palace of the king. Even bad attitudes can’t thwart God! And Saul’s sour disposition became David’s open door.
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 5
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Cream Rising
(I Samuel 16:12-14)
A saying common among rural folks instructs us that “the cream always rises to the top.” Of course, the saying hearkens back to milking the family cow and waiting for the cream to rise in order to skim it from the milk. The cream, the best part for non-dieters, always rises—easily separated from the more common milk. As with milk, so it is with men. The cream always rises to the top, easily distinguished from average milk. The best rise above the rest. Talent sets one apart from mediocrity. Accomplishment makes one stand out in a crowd.
David was pure cream. He was “ruddy,” meaning he had a healthy, glowing complexion. In addition, he was manfully proportioned—an outstanding specimen of young masculinity. As we learned yesterday, however, looks aren’t everything with God. God, who saw beyond David’s handsome features, detected a Godly heart as well (Acts 13:22).
In obedience to the Lord, Samuel anointed David “in the midst of his brethren” (13). In other words, from that day forward, David—at least in position—would stand out from his older brothers. Though young and inexperienced, the cream would rise to the top. The shepherd boy would excel his warrior brothers in every way: conquest, passion, leadership, and—most importantly—heart.
From the time of David’s anointing, “the spirit of the Lord came upon David.” In other words, his successes would not spring from native pluck alone. His most brilliant battles, lofty hymns of praise, and valiant feats would come from within—from the very presence of God, whose Spirit delights to fill the obedient heart. With God’s blessing, the cream would rise even farther. David, the young shepherd, would become the most revered figure in Jewish history!
Cream Rising
(I Samuel 16:12-14)
A saying common among rural folks instructs us that “the cream always rises to the top.” Of course, the saying hearkens back to milking the family cow and waiting for the cream to rise in order to skim it from the milk. The cream, the best part for non-dieters, always rises—easily separated from the more common milk. As with milk, so it is with men. The cream always rises to the top, easily distinguished from average milk. The best rise above the rest. Talent sets one apart from mediocrity. Accomplishment makes one stand out in a crowd.
David was pure cream. He was “ruddy,” meaning he had a healthy, glowing complexion. In addition, he was manfully proportioned—an outstanding specimen of young masculinity. As we learned yesterday, however, looks aren’t everything with God. God, who saw beyond David’s handsome features, detected a Godly heart as well (Acts 13:22).
In obedience to the Lord, Samuel anointed David “in the midst of his brethren” (13). In other words, from that day forward, David—at least in position—would stand out from his older brothers. Though young and inexperienced, the cream would rise to the top. The shepherd boy would excel his warrior brothers in every way: conquest, passion, leadership, and—most importantly—heart.
From the time of David’s anointing, “the spirit of the Lord came upon David.” In other words, his successes would not spring from native pluck alone. His most brilliant battles, lofty hymns of praise, and valiant feats would come from within—from the very presence of God, whose Spirit delights to fill the obedient heart. With God’s blessing, the cream would rise even farther. David, the young shepherd, would become the most revered figure in Jewish history!
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 4
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Not What We Were Expecting
(I Samuel 16:6-11)
God’s ways are not man’s ways, and often God’s choices do not fit with man’s preconceived notions. In fact, God seems to delight in surprising man by His contrary choices. For example, one would expect the King of Kings to be born in a palace; God choose a lowly stable. One would expect an Apostle to enjoy universal prestige; Paul suffered almost universal contempt. One would expect the Messiah’s forerunner to be a man of culture and refinement; God sent John the Baptist.
It was only natural for Samuel to be drawn to Eliab (6). He seemed like good king material! He was tall and strikingly handsome. Perhaps Samuel was familiar with his winsome personality and charismatic leadership traits. Whatever the reason, the Prophet thought he had discovered the Lord’s anointed at first glance.
Contrary to what he was expecting, the Lord instructed Samuel to pass by the venerable Eliab (7). Jesse, disappointed that Eliab was not the man, brought forward another of his favorite sons, Abinadab. He, too, was rejected. Perhaps the athletic Shammah was the chosen one? No, Samuel passed over him as well. One by one, the prophet examined Jesse’s sons; and one by one the Lord told Samuel to pass them up. Frustrated, Samuel asked Jesse if he had any more sons. Hesitantly, Jesse mentioned the youngest, little David the shepherd boy. And the Holy Spirit whispered to Samuel, “That’s God’s man.”
God, you see, doesn’t make judgments using human criteria. God looks upon the heart (7). And sometimes God’s choices surprise us. Our lesson: Don’t limit God. Remember, His choices are best—and often what we least expect.
Not What We Were Expecting
(I Samuel 16:6-11)
God’s ways are not man’s ways, and often God’s choices do not fit with man’s preconceived notions. In fact, God seems to delight in surprising man by His contrary choices. For example, one would expect the King of Kings to be born in a palace; God choose a lowly stable. One would expect an Apostle to enjoy universal prestige; Paul suffered almost universal contempt. One would expect the Messiah’s forerunner to be a man of culture and refinement; God sent John the Baptist.
It was only natural for Samuel to be drawn to Eliab (6). He seemed like good king material! He was tall and strikingly handsome. Perhaps Samuel was familiar with his winsome personality and charismatic leadership traits. Whatever the reason, the Prophet thought he had discovered the Lord’s anointed at first glance.
Contrary to what he was expecting, the Lord instructed Samuel to pass by the venerable Eliab (7). Jesse, disappointed that Eliab was not the man, brought forward another of his favorite sons, Abinadab. He, too, was rejected. Perhaps the athletic Shammah was the chosen one? No, Samuel passed over him as well. One by one, the prophet examined Jesse’s sons; and one by one the Lord told Samuel to pass them up. Frustrated, Samuel asked Jesse if he had any more sons. Hesitantly, Jesse mentioned the youngest, little David the shepherd boy. And the Holy Spirit whispered to Samuel, “That’s God’s man.”
God, you see, doesn’t make judgments using human criteria. God looks upon the heart (7). And sometimes God’s choices surprise us. Our lesson: Don’t limit God. Remember, His choices are best—and often what we least expect.
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 3
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Wasted Tears
(I Samuel 16:1-5)
Genuine friendship mourns deeply its losses. Those who love strongly grieve intensely when relationships go awry. The Prophet Samuel, a spiritually consecrated man, forged resilient bonds of friendship with Saul. Saul’s sins, however, broke the relationship, and—after parting ways—they never saw each other again.
The breach in friendship did not engender bitterness in Samuel. He was too spiritual for that. Rather, Samuel mourned for Saul as if he had died (15:35). He wept for the potential lost, the talent wasted, and the heart hardened. He also wept because he had lost a real friend.
Sin is always destructive. Sin always does its alienating work. Sin builds walls of mistrust and betrayal that may never come down. So it was between Samuel and Saul. Their friendship ended, and intense loneliness set in for Samuel. The Scripture records that both God and Samuel were deeply disappointed (15:35).
Even in significant loss, there comes a time to stop grieving. The grieving process is normal, but it should also be temporary. Life must go on. The sun comes up after our darkest nights—and it does so until the end of time. When Samuel’s grief had gone too far, the Lord rebuked him: “How long wilt thou mourn for Saul?” God’s question indicated that the time for sorrow had past. God then instructed the old prophet that there was still work to do. A new king would be needed, and Samuel would once again do the anointing (16:1).
Though Samuel’s estrangement from Saul caused him to his former friend (2), Samuel did as the Lord commanded. Samuel had no idea he was about to meet a future hero, warrior, and king. Something good was about to happen, and Samuel needed to dry his tears in order to see it!
Wasted Tears
(I Samuel 16:1-5)
Genuine friendship mourns deeply its losses. Those who love strongly grieve intensely when relationships go awry. The Prophet Samuel, a spiritually consecrated man, forged resilient bonds of friendship with Saul. Saul’s sins, however, broke the relationship, and—after parting ways—they never saw each other again.
The breach in friendship did not engender bitterness in Samuel. He was too spiritual for that. Rather, Samuel mourned for Saul as if he had died (15:35). He wept for the potential lost, the talent wasted, and the heart hardened. He also wept because he had lost a real friend.
Sin is always destructive. Sin always does its alienating work. Sin builds walls of mistrust and betrayal that may never come down. So it was between Samuel and Saul. Their friendship ended, and intense loneliness set in for Samuel. The Scripture records that both God and Samuel were deeply disappointed (15:35).
Even in significant loss, there comes a time to stop grieving. The grieving process is normal, but it should also be temporary. Life must go on. The sun comes up after our darkest nights—and it does so until the end of time. When Samuel’s grief had gone too far, the Lord rebuked him: “How long wilt thou mourn for Saul?” God’s question indicated that the time for sorrow had past. God then instructed the old prophet that there was still work to do. A new king would be needed, and Samuel would once again do the anointing (16:1).
Though Samuel’s estrangement from Saul caused him to his former friend (2), Samuel did as the Lord commanded. Samuel had no idea he was about to meet a future hero, warrior, and king. Something good was about to happen, and Samuel needed to dry his tears in order to see it!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 2
Monday, March 1, 2010
Fear and Failure
(I Samuel 15:23-35)
After what must have been a heated conversation between him and Samuel, King Saul finally admitted his disobedience. From the earlier context we know that Saul made excuses and mentally minimized his sin. The old prophet would have none of it! He pointedly reminded Saul that his disobedience was as serious a matter as witchcraft and idolatry (23). No words needed to be minced; the truth is the truth.
In an interesting twist, Saul gives insight into his disobedience. Perhaps he is just making another excuse—once again blaming the people—or, just maybe, he gives a genuine glimpse into his thinking. Saul declares, “I have transgressed the commandment of the Lord, and thy words; because I feared the people, and obeyed their voice” (emphasis added). Perhaps Saul’s underlying motivation in disobedience really was fear.
Proverbs 29:25 says, “The fear of man bringeth a snare.” In other words, fearing what men think is a trap. One’s behavior is determined by what he fears. For example, if one fears the criticism of others, he may spend money he doesn’t have to impress people he doesn’t like. As foolish as that sounds, it happens all the time. One who fears social isolation may, even against his conscience, sip a cocktail or tip back a beer—just to fit in. Maybe a lady who knows better decides to wear a short skirt or tight top so that her “friends” won’t think she’s “not with it.” All of these are actions taken out of fear.
In the given examples, the outcomes would have been different had these folks feared God more than men. Fearing God would have helped them make right choices. Saul “feared the people” more than he feared God, and he lost the kingdom over it. Think about it: Who do you fear?
Fear and Failure
(I Samuel 15:23-35)
After what must have been a heated conversation between him and Samuel, King Saul finally admitted his disobedience. From the earlier context we know that Saul made excuses and mentally minimized his sin. The old prophet would have none of it! He pointedly reminded Saul that his disobedience was as serious a matter as witchcraft and idolatry (23). No words needed to be minced; the truth is the truth.
In an interesting twist, Saul gives insight into his disobedience. Perhaps he is just making another excuse—once again blaming the people—or, just maybe, he gives a genuine glimpse into his thinking. Saul declares, “I have transgressed the commandment of the Lord, and thy words; because I feared the people, and obeyed their voice” (emphasis added). Perhaps Saul’s underlying motivation in disobedience really was fear.
Proverbs 29:25 says, “The fear of man bringeth a snare.” In other words, fearing what men think is a trap. One’s behavior is determined by what he fears. For example, if one fears the criticism of others, he may spend money he doesn’t have to impress people he doesn’t like. As foolish as that sounds, it happens all the time. One who fears social isolation may, even against his conscience, sip a cocktail or tip back a beer—just to fit in. Maybe a lady who knows better decides to wear a short skirt or tight top so that her “friends” won’t think she’s “not with it.” All of these are actions taken out of fear.
In the given examples, the outcomes would have been different had these folks feared God more than men. Fearing God would have helped them make right choices. Saul “feared the people” more than he feared God, and he lost the kingdom over it. Think about it: Who do you fear?
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 1
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Better than Sacrifice
(I Samuel 15:16-23)
Human nature always attempts to buy its way out of trouble. Rather than deal with the root cause of the problem, we think that we can make everything right if we throw enough money at it. For example, a husband utters some hasty, unkind words to his wife. Feeling bad later that day, he buys her a dozen roses (or two dozen, as the transgression may merit). Of course, that should fix the problem, right? After all, they weren’t even on sale! What he fails to understand is that roses didn’t cause the problem and they’re unlikely to fix it.
Saul practiced the same type of bartering on a much larger scale. Having been commanded to “utterly destroy” the Amalekites, Saul determined to spare King Agag, and he allowed the people to plunder the flocks and herds. In short, his actions were direct disobedience to God.
When confronted a second time, how did Saul respond? He blamed the people again and he claimed he was making a spiritual sacrifice again (21). Samuel was probably a little tired of this well-worn excuse (see verse 15). So, in no uncertain terms, he explained to Saul that he could not buy himself out of his troubles. “To obey is better than sacrifice,” Samuel intoned. In other words, no amount of sacrifice, service, money, time, dedication, or good intentions can take the place of simple obedience.
It’s time we stopped trying to buy God off. Rather, we should openly and freely confess our sins and failures to Him. Then, with a heart cleansed from sin and a conscience freed from guild, we should seek to obey Him. Personal sacrifice is nice. It has its place. It’s the icing on the cake. But it can never replace simple obedience as the primary hope of God for His Children.
Better than Sacrifice
(I Samuel 15:16-23)
Human nature always attempts to buy its way out of trouble. Rather than deal with the root cause of the problem, we think that we can make everything right if we throw enough money at it. For example, a husband utters some hasty, unkind words to his wife. Feeling bad later that day, he buys her a dozen roses (or two dozen, as the transgression may merit). Of course, that should fix the problem, right? After all, they weren’t even on sale! What he fails to understand is that roses didn’t cause the problem and they’re unlikely to fix it.
Saul practiced the same type of bartering on a much larger scale. Having been commanded to “utterly destroy” the Amalekites, Saul determined to spare King Agag, and he allowed the people to plunder the flocks and herds. In short, his actions were direct disobedience to God.
When confronted a second time, how did Saul respond? He blamed the people again and he claimed he was making a spiritual sacrifice again (21). Samuel was probably a little tired of this well-worn excuse (see verse 15). So, in no uncertain terms, he explained to Saul that he could not buy himself out of his troubles. “To obey is better than sacrifice,” Samuel intoned. In other words, no amount of sacrifice, service, money, time, dedication, or good intentions can take the place of simple obedience.
It’s time we stopped trying to buy God off. Rather, we should openly and freely confess our sins and failures to Him. Then, with a heart cleansed from sin and a conscience freed from guild, we should seek to obey Him. Personal sacrifice is nice. It has its place. It’s the icing on the cake. But it can never replace simple obedience as the primary hope of God for His Children.
Friday, February 19, 2010
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 7
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Red-Handed
(I Samuel 15:7-15)
When one is caught “red-handed,” it is human nature to quickly make excuses for inexcusable actions. The phrase “caught red-handed” was originally a Scottish legal term for evidence in the prosecution of poachers. Poachers, of course, take wild game out of season or illegally. To be “caught red-handed” meant the poacher was caught with the blood of the slain animal on his hands—thus proving his guilt and assuring his successful prosecution. The phrase has come to refer to one being caught in the act of questionable behavior.
By definition, then, Saul had been caught red-handed by Samuel. Saul knew his responsibility was to completely destroy everything pertaining to the Amalekites. In direct disobedience, Saul spared King Agag and the best of the sheep and oxen (9). Having been informed by the Lord of Saul’s transgression, Samuel arrived just in time to hear the bleating of the Amalekite sheep (14). The old prophet confronted the king, and—once again—Saul blamed others for his sin.
Without hesitation, the mighty king blamed the “people” for sparing the sheep and oxen (15). While they doubtless had a hand in the transgression, the responsibility for carrying out God’s orders rested on Saul’s shoulders alone. He had miserably failed in the area of exacting obedience.
Beyond blaming others, Saul’s second defense is even more creative. His disobedience, he argued, was for the greater good—a sacrifice unto the Lord (15). Dr. Bob Jones, Sr. used to say, “It’s never right to do wrong in order to get a chance to do right.” To that we would add, “When you do wrong, take responsibility; don’t pass the buck!”
Red-Handed
(I Samuel 15:7-15)
When one is caught “red-handed,” it is human nature to quickly make excuses for inexcusable actions. The phrase “caught red-handed” was originally a Scottish legal term for evidence in the prosecution of poachers. Poachers, of course, take wild game out of season or illegally. To be “caught red-handed” meant the poacher was caught with the blood of the slain animal on his hands—thus proving his guilt and assuring his successful prosecution. The phrase has come to refer to one being caught in the act of questionable behavior.
By definition, then, Saul had been caught red-handed by Samuel. Saul knew his responsibility was to completely destroy everything pertaining to the Amalekites. In direct disobedience, Saul spared King Agag and the best of the sheep and oxen (9). Having been informed by the Lord of Saul’s transgression, Samuel arrived just in time to hear the bleating of the Amalekite sheep (14). The old prophet confronted the king, and—once again—Saul blamed others for his sin.
Without hesitation, the mighty king blamed the “people” for sparing the sheep and oxen (15). While they doubtless had a hand in the transgression, the responsibility for carrying out God’s orders rested on Saul’s shoulders alone. He had miserably failed in the area of exacting obedience.
Beyond blaming others, Saul’s second defense is even more creative. His disobedience, he argued, was for the greater good—a sacrifice unto the Lord (15). Dr. Bob Jones, Sr. used to say, “It’s never right to do wrong in order to get a chance to do right.” To that we would add, “When you do wrong, take responsibility; don’t pass the buck!”
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 6
Friday, February 26, 2010
The Baby and the Bathwater
(I Samuel 15:1-6)
I Samuel 15 records Saul’s Amalekite war. The Amalekites were longstanding enemies of Israel, dating back to their resistance of Moses’ entry into the Sinai Peninsula (Exodus 17). They were apparently gaining in strength, residing to the South of Israel; and, apparently, they posed a threat to Israel’s national security. Samuel told Saul to wage war against the Amalekites and to “utterly destroy” them. The words “utterly destroy” meant nothing less than total destruction—what we today call a “scorched earth” policy.
It was Saul’s initial intention to obey Samuel’s instructions explicitly. Saul, however, met with an exceptional case in the tribe of Kenites who were living among the Amalekites. Rather than execute the innocent with the guilty, Saul warned the Kenites to depart from the Amalekites before the battle began (6). In other words, Saul didn’t want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Who were the Kenites? History records that Moses’ father-in-law Jethro was a Kenite (Judges 1:16). He had advised Moses to divide his governing responsibilities among able men (Exodus 18). In addition, Jethro’s son had been helpful to Moses and the fledgling nation (Num. 10:29-32). All in all, the Kenites were good, salt-of-the-earth kind of folks. Scripture always records them as allied with God’s people. In fact, when later faced with the same conundrum, David also spared the Kenites, whose only mistake appears to be neighboring with the Amalekites (I Sam. 27:8-10; 30:29). Like Saul, David didn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Obedience presupposes discernment. Learn to condemn evil and spare good. Ask God to give you the wisdom to discern between the two.
The Baby and the Bathwater
(I Samuel 15:1-6)
I Samuel 15 records Saul’s Amalekite war. The Amalekites were longstanding enemies of Israel, dating back to their resistance of Moses’ entry into the Sinai Peninsula (Exodus 17). They were apparently gaining in strength, residing to the South of Israel; and, apparently, they posed a threat to Israel’s national security. Samuel told Saul to wage war against the Amalekites and to “utterly destroy” them. The words “utterly destroy” meant nothing less than total destruction—what we today call a “scorched earth” policy.
It was Saul’s initial intention to obey Samuel’s instructions explicitly. Saul, however, met with an exceptional case in the tribe of Kenites who were living among the Amalekites. Rather than execute the innocent with the guilty, Saul warned the Kenites to depart from the Amalekites before the battle began (6). In other words, Saul didn’t want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Who were the Kenites? History records that Moses’ father-in-law Jethro was a Kenite (Judges 1:16). He had advised Moses to divide his governing responsibilities among able men (Exodus 18). In addition, Jethro’s son had been helpful to Moses and the fledgling nation (Num. 10:29-32). All in all, the Kenites were good, salt-of-the-earth kind of folks. Scripture always records them as allied with God’s people. In fact, when later faced with the same conundrum, David also spared the Kenites, whose only mistake appears to be neighboring with the Amalekites (I Sam. 27:8-10; 30:29). Like Saul, David didn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Obedience presupposes discernment. Learn to condemn evil and spare good. Ask God to give you the wisdom to discern between the two.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 5
Thursday, February 25, 2010
How to Double Your Trouble
(I Samuel 14:47-52)
Saul’s troubled reign was a period of great unrest in Israel. Though his military abilities improved, the Israelites faced ever increasing challenges from their age-old enemies, the Philistines. In addition, the Ammonites, Edomites, and a few other “ites” joined in vexing the Jews. One battle led to another; and for every defeated foe, two new ones arose. Was all this trouble mere coincidence? No! As we shall see, Israel’s disobedience led directly to her ongoing conflicts.
God’s plan for the Jewish state was theocratic—a nation ruled by God. The human leaders He had chosen were judges, not monarchs. Though the system of judges seems a less organized, less centralized system, it was sufficient because God’s blessing hand was upon it. In other words, God amply made up for the foibles of the human judges. The Bible emphatically states that “the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel” (7:13). As long as Samuel functioned as God’s appointed judge, Israel was in safe hands.
Someone has wisely stated that it is better to be in a dangerous place in the will of God than in a safe place outside of His will. Israel learned that lesson the hard way. In demanding a king, they abandoned God’s plan for Israel’s government. The new king centralized government authority, raised a substantial army, and met with some military success. But something had changed. It appears that God’s protective hand was not as obvious under Saul as it had been under Samuel. Indeed, the nation that had known peace now knew ongoing conflict. Simply stated, obedience to God brings His protection and blessing in every endeavor. Disobedience, however, brings conflict—many times with an uncertain outcome. It’s always better to obey God!
How to Double Your Trouble
(I Samuel 14:47-52)
Saul’s troubled reign was a period of great unrest in Israel. Though his military abilities improved, the Israelites faced ever increasing challenges from their age-old enemies, the Philistines. In addition, the Ammonites, Edomites, and a few other “ites” joined in vexing the Jews. One battle led to another; and for every defeated foe, two new ones arose. Was all this trouble mere coincidence? No! As we shall see, Israel’s disobedience led directly to her ongoing conflicts.
God’s plan for the Jewish state was theocratic—a nation ruled by God. The human leaders He had chosen were judges, not monarchs. Though the system of judges seems a less organized, less centralized system, it was sufficient because God’s blessing hand was upon it. In other words, God amply made up for the foibles of the human judges. The Bible emphatically states that “the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel” (7:13). As long as Samuel functioned as God’s appointed judge, Israel was in safe hands.
Someone has wisely stated that it is better to be in a dangerous place in the will of God than in a safe place outside of His will. Israel learned that lesson the hard way. In demanding a king, they abandoned God’s plan for Israel’s government. The new king centralized government authority, raised a substantial army, and met with some military success. But something had changed. It appears that God’s protective hand was not as obvious under Saul as it had been under Samuel. Indeed, the nation that had known peace now knew ongoing conflict. Simply stated, obedience to God brings His protection and blessing in every endeavor. Disobedience, however, brings conflict—many times with an uncertain outcome. It’s always better to obey God!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 4
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Going Too Far
(I Samuel 14:35-46)
Saul’s leadership was about to take another embarrassing blow. It appears that Saul, determined to chase down the Philistines, built an altar as a place of worship and inquiry of the Lord (35). Though he was determined to carry out a night raid, one of the priests encouraged him to seek the mind of the God (36). The Lord, however, remained disquietingly silent (37). Saul interpreted God’s silence as the presence of sin in the camp. And what sin could be greater, Saul’s pride reasoned, than one violating his oath?
Complicating matters, Saul dogmatically stated that even if the sin were found in Jonathan, he would be put to death. Can you imagine the somber response of the people? Not only had the Lord failed to answer him, but now the people became uncharacteristically quiet as well (39).
Saul, missing a thousand non-verbal clues, persisted bullishly down his foolish pathway. Lots were drawn, and Saul and Jonathan were chosen. At this point, humility would have admitted the foolishness of the pursuit and would have ended the shenanigans. Saul, not one to let humility get in his way, insisted on another round of lots. When Jonathan was chosen, Saul ploughed right ahead, declaring that his own son must die! Notice the tragic blindness of pride!
Then the people stepped in. Essentially, they declared that Saul was going too far, and that they would protect Jonathan. The Bible records that the “people rescued Jonathan” (45). This time Saul had demonstrated not only his lack of wisdom, but also his lack of common sense. Pride had taken him a complicit captive and would ultimately lead Saul to his death. Let’s learn when to swallow pride, admit mistakes, and seek forgiveness. Let’s not act the fool!
Going Too Far
(I Samuel 14:35-46)
Saul’s leadership was about to take another embarrassing blow. It appears that Saul, determined to chase down the Philistines, built an altar as a place of worship and inquiry of the Lord (35). Though he was determined to carry out a night raid, one of the priests encouraged him to seek the mind of the God (36). The Lord, however, remained disquietingly silent (37). Saul interpreted God’s silence as the presence of sin in the camp. And what sin could be greater, Saul’s pride reasoned, than one violating his oath?
Complicating matters, Saul dogmatically stated that even if the sin were found in Jonathan, he would be put to death. Can you imagine the somber response of the people? Not only had the Lord failed to answer him, but now the people became uncharacteristically quiet as well (39).
Saul, missing a thousand non-verbal clues, persisted bullishly down his foolish pathway. Lots were drawn, and Saul and Jonathan were chosen. At this point, humility would have admitted the foolishness of the pursuit and would have ended the shenanigans. Saul, not one to let humility get in his way, insisted on another round of lots. When Jonathan was chosen, Saul ploughed right ahead, declaring that his own son must die! Notice the tragic blindness of pride!
Then the people stepped in. Essentially, they declared that Saul was going too far, and that they would protect Jonathan. The Bible records that the “people rescued Jonathan” (45). This time Saul had demonstrated not only his lack of wisdom, but also his lack of common sense. Pride had taken him a complicit captive and would ultimately lead Saul to his death. Let’s learn when to swallow pride, admit mistakes, and seek forgiveness. Let’s not act the fool!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 3
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Haste Makes Waste
(I Samuel 14:24-34)
Saul had become at best an erratic leader. As one reads of his decline, one is struck by his insecurities. For example, Saul found it necessary to bind the army with an unreasonable oath and threaten any who dared to disobey (24). His insistence that they eat no food (probably so they wouldn’t be distracted from the battle) was both unwise and unreasonable. Threats should not be used for motivation, and they rarely accomplish long-term goals (Eph. 6:9). Rather than focusing the army on the battle, their ensuing hunger became the ultimate distraction. Apparently Saul wasn’t familiar with the truism, “An army marches on its stomach.”
Jonathan unwittingly violated Saul’s oath. When he ate the honey, his “eyes were enlightened,” in other words, he felt physically revived. When informed of his father’s threat, Jonathan answered rather hastily, “My father hath troubled the land.” Though a somewhat disrespectful comment, it was true none the less. Jonathan knew that his father’s threat could have long-term consequences in the morale of the troops.
Saul had indeed “troubled the land.” In fact, the army became so famished that they unrestrainedly gorged themselves upon Philistine spoil—not even bothering to drain the carcasses of their blood as was the lawful Jewish custom (Gen. 9:4; Deut. 15:23). When Saul heard of the spontaneous feast he declared to his army, “Ye have transgressed” (33)!
True, the people had violated the Scripture in eating the blood of the slain animals. But let’s look deeper. In reality, it was Saul’s hasty oath that pushed the people to such intense hunger. It was Saul’s bullish anger that had caused the problem. The lesson: refrain from hasty and rash decisions—especially when they impact others!
Haste Makes Waste
(I Samuel 14:24-34)
Saul had become at best an erratic leader. As one reads of his decline, one is struck by his insecurities. For example, Saul found it necessary to bind the army with an unreasonable oath and threaten any who dared to disobey (24). His insistence that they eat no food (probably so they wouldn’t be distracted from the battle) was both unwise and unreasonable. Threats should not be used for motivation, and they rarely accomplish long-term goals (Eph. 6:9). Rather than focusing the army on the battle, their ensuing hunger became the ultimate distraction. Apparently Saul wasn’t familiar with the truism, “An army marches on its stomach.”
Jonathan unwittingly violated Saul’s oath. When he ate the honey, his “eyes were enlightened,” in other words, he felt physically revived. When informed of his father’s threat, Jonathan answered rather hastily, “My father hath troubled the land.” Though a somewhat disrespectful comment, it was true none the less. Jonathan knew that his father’s threat could have long-term consequences in the morale of the troops.
Saul had indeed “troubled the land.” In fact, the army became so famished that they unrestrainedly gorged themselves upon Philistine spoil—not even bothering to drain the carcasses of their blood as was the lawful Jewish custom (Gen. 9:4; Deut. 15:23). When Saul heard of the spontaneous feast he declared to his army, “Ye have transgressed” (33)!
True, the people had violated the Scripture in eating the blood of the slain animals. But let’s look deeper. In reality, it was Saul’s hasty oath that pushed the people to such intense hunger. It was Saul’s bullish anger that had caused the problem. The lesson: refrain from hasty and rash decisions—especially when they impact others!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 2
Monday, February 22, 2010
Finding God in Life’s Battles
(I Samuel 14:7-23)
Life comes with its difficulties and daily battles. While not so dramatic as Jonathan’s battle with the Philistines, every day challenges us with Philistines of our own—problems that arise from the mundane tasks of work, family, and life in general. Interestingly, Jonathan’s example provides spiritual lessons when we face Philistines in our own lives.
Notice first that Jonathan desired God’s glory above everything else. Yesterday’s passage revealed Jonathan’s righteous indignation that the “uncircumcised” posed a threat to God’s chosen people (6). His chief concern was not glory for himself, but rather the glory of God. Motive matters in the battles of life.
Secondly, Jonathan sought God’s will regarding the situation. He didn’t just go off “half-cocked” without first seeking God’s specific will. When challenges come, we sometimes react too quickly, not seeking Heaven’s guidance in specific circumstances. Jonathan sought God’s specific will for the battle (8-10).
In addition, Jonathan acted upon God’s leading. Once God had made His will clear, Jonathan engaged the enemy with enthusiasm. Sometimes God makes His plan crystal clear, yet we hesitate to follow His leading. In effect, we second-guess God. Don’t allow the bigness of the task to deter you from God’s revealed will (11-14).
Lastly, Jonathan relied upon God’s power. God expects our obedience, and He also expects us to rely upon Him to accomplish his plan. Paul said, “We are laborers together with God” (I Cor. 3:9). We, like Jonathan, should depend ultimately upon God to empower us to win the battles of life (15-23).
Finding God in Life’s Battles
(I Samuel 14:7-23)
Life comes with its difficulties and daily battles. While not so dramatic as Jonathan’s battle with the Philistines, every day challenges us with Philistines of our own—problems that arise from the mundane tasks of work, family, and life in general. Interestingly, Jonathan’s example provides spiritual lessons when we face Philistines in our own lives.
Notice first that Jonathan desired God’s glory above everything else. Yesterday’s passage revealed Jonathan’s righteous indignation that the “uncircumcised” posed a threat to God’s chosen people (6). His chief concern was not glory for himself, but rather the glory of God. Motive matters in the battles of life.
Secondly, Jonathan sought God’s will regarding the situation. He didn’t just go off “half-cocked” without first seeking God’s specific will. When challenges come, we sometimes react too quickly, not seeking Heaven’s guidance in specific circumstances. Jonathan sought God’s specific will for the battle (8-10).
In addition, Jonathan acted upon God’s leading. Once God had made His will clear, Jonathan engaged the enemy with enthusiasm. Sometimes God makes His plan crystal clear, yet we hesitate to follow His leading. In effect, we second-guess God. Don’t allow the bigness of the task to deter you from God’s revealed will (11-14).
Lastly, Jonathan relied upon God’s power. God expects our obedience, and He also expects us to rely upon Him to accomplish his plan. Paul said, “We are laborers together with God” (I Cor. 3:9). We, like Jonathan, should depend ultimately upon God to empower us to win the battles of life (15-23).
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 1
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Inspirational Faith
(I Samuel 14:1-6)
Saul’s recent failures had greatly demoralized Israel’s fighting men. While some abandoned the army altogether (13:6), others followed hesitantly—with almost no confidence in their impetuous leader (13:7). The enlistment dwindled to around 600 men, and the threat of the Philistines grew with each passing day of Saul’s brooding indecision.
Jonathan, Saul’s honorable son, knew something had to be done. The heroic exploit of which we read in today’s Bible passage was not executed to win Jonathan fame and glory. Rather, Jonathan understood that the Lord’s name was at stake. Doubtless he also held concern for his father’s reputation. And so, without a chance of success from a military perspective, Jonathan planned an attack.
Jonathan’s great faith in the Lord is both instructive and inspirational. Facing dire odds he declared, “…there is no restraint to the Lord to save by many or by few.”
Jonathan’s declaration teaches us much about faith. First, Jonathan exercised faith in trying circumstances. Faith is best demonstrated when the odds are decidedly against us. If God shielded us from all trials, there would be no need for faith.
In addition, Jonathan’s faith resulted in personal boldness. His plan was risky at best and foolhardy at worst. His faith, however, gave him the confidence to proceed with his plan. Timidity is not a mark of faith.
Lastly, his faith inspired his follower to greatness. Rather than deserting, the armor-bearer became a champion—all because of Jonathan’s faith. May our faith in times of trial be an inspiration to others!
Inspirational Faith
(I Samuel 14:1-6)
Saul’s recent failures had greatly demoralized Israel’s fighting men. While some abandoned the army altogether (13:6), others followed hesitantly—with almost no confidence in their impetuous leader (13:7). The enlistment dwindled to around 600 men, and the threat of the Philistines grew with each passing day of Saul’s brooding indecision.
Jonathan, Saul’s honorable son, knew something had to be done. The heroic exploit of which we read in today’s Bible passage was not executed to win Jonathan fame and glory. Rather, Jonathan understood that the Lord’s name was at stake. Doubtless he also held concern for his father’s reputation. And so, without a chance of success from a military perspective, Jonathan planned an attack.
Jonathan’s great faith in the Lord is both instructive and inspirational. Facing dire odds he declared, “…there is no restraint to the Lord to save by many or by few.”
Jonathan’s declaration teaches us much about faith. First, Jonathan exercised faith in trying circumstances. Faith is best demonstrated when the odds are decidedly against us. If God shielded us from all trials, there would be no need for faith.
In addition, Jonathan’s faith resulted in personal boldness. His plan was risky at best and foolhardy at worst. His faith, however, gave him the confidence to proceed with his plan. Timidity is not a mark of faith.
Lastly, his faith inspired his follower to greatness. Rather than deserting, the armor-bearer became a champion—all because of Jonathan’s faith. May our faith in times of trial be an inspiration to others!
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 7
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Turning Point
(I Samuel 13:13-23)
Samuel’s pronouncement against Saul’s assumed dynasty marks a serious turning point in the life of the King. His willful disobedience would cost him his throne, as no descendent of Saul’s would ever reign as king. God, Samuel informed Saul, would seek another king—a man after His own heart. And Saul’s family would quickly sink into a quagmire of oblivion (14).
Such a grim prophecy must have cut Saul deeply. In fact, it marks a turning point in Saul’s attitude as king and aptitude as leader. The fair-haired idealist, so easily admired, morphs now into a moody, unpredictable tyrant—the polar opposite of his sunny youth.
What happened? Simply put, Saul needlessly exhausted his resources. He traded faith in God for expedient pragmatism. He exchanged friendship with Samuel for strained estrangement. He bartered the admiration of his army for indulgence of his impatience. And, with each ensuing exchange, Saul further impoverished himself.
Saul needed God back in his life. But Samuel’s pronouncement may have been too much to bear. Perhaps Saul reasoned, “If the Lord won’t help me, I’ll just do it myself.” Whatever his thinking, Samuel’s words—rather than bringing repentance—hardened the King.
In a curious historic note, the Bible tells us that not only had Israel’s armies greatly diminished, but their ability to procure weaponry was hampered by the Philistines’ monopoly of the ironworks. Saul needed the Lord now more than ever! Sadly, Saul would continue to stumble down his lonely path to his ultimate destruction.
Turning Point
(I Samuel 13:13-23)
Samuel’s pronouncement against Saul’s assumed dynasty marks a serious turning point in the life of the King. His willful disobedience would cost him his throne, as no descendent of Saul’s would ever reign as king. God, Samuel informed Saul, would seek another king—a man after His own heart. And Saul’s family would quickly sink into a quagmire of oblivion (14).
Such a grim prophecy must have cut Saul deeply. In fact, it marks a turning point in Saul’s attitude as king and aptitude as leader. The fair-haired idealist, so easily admired, morphs now into a moody, unpredictable tyrant—the polar opposite of his sunny youth.
What happened? Simply put, Saul needlessly exhausted his resources. He traded faith in God for expedient pragmatism. He exchanged friendship with Samuel for strained estrangement. He bartered the admiration of his army for indulgence of his impatience. And, with each ensuing exchange, Saul further impoverished himself.
Saul needed God back in his life. But Samuel’s pronouncement may have been too much to bear. Perhaps Saul reasoned, “If the Lord won’t help me, I’ll just do it myself.” Whatever his thinking, Samuel’s words—rather than bringing repentance—hardened the King.
In a curious historic note, the Bible tells us that not only had Israel’s armies greatly diminished, but their ability to procure weaponry was hampered by the Philistines’ monopoly of the ironworks. Saul needed the Lord now more than ever! Sadly, Saul would continue to stumble down his lonely path to his ultimate destruction.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 6
Friday, February 19, 2010
Rationalization
(I Samuel 13:8-12)
Sin is not always impulsive. Frequently we devise elaborate reasons for our actions, even though we know they are sinful. Sometimes we make ourselves believe that sin was—in a given set of circumstances—the only viable option. Once we’ve convinced ourselves, we sin—and sometimes face the monumental task of convincing others as well.
Saul was in just such a predicament. Having illegally usurped the priest’s office, Saul—in fear and impatience—sacrificed the animals that were Samuel’s alone to offer. And, in providential poetic justice, Samuel arrived just in time to see the smoke arise.
Saul’s litany of excuses would almost be funny if it weren’t so pathetic. The brave king immediately resorted to the blame game—passing the buck. First, he blamed the troops who had deserted him. He had to act quickly, he reasoned, or face losing them all. Secondly, he blamed Samuel. “If only Samuel had been punctual, I wouldn’t have been forced to sin!” Thirdly, he blamed the Philistines. “The Devil made me do it,” he reasoned. Lastly, he blamed himself while still declaring his innocence: “I forced myself,” he pleaded (11, 12).
Ultimately, none of Saul’s excuses worked with Samuel. A wise old preacher used to say, “An excuse is the skin of a reason stuffed with a lie.” Samuel viewed Saul’s rationalizations the same way.
Perhaps the saddest part of the story is that Saul likely believed his own excuses. It is apparent that he had rehearsed them beforehand—just in case. At any rate, he believed his rationalizations enough to act upon them—and then defend his sorry conduct. Be careful how you justify your actions. You may one day have to convince others; and you will ultimately have to convince God.
Rationalization
(I Samuel 13:8-12)
Sin is not always impulsive. Frequently we devise elaborate reasons for our actions, even though we know they are sinful. Sometimes we make ourselves believe that sin was—in a given set of circumstances—the only viable option. Once we’ve convinced ourselves, we sin—and sometimes face the monumental task of convincing others as well.
Saul was in just such a predicament. Having illegally usurped the priest’s office, Saul—in fear and impatience—sacrificed the animals that were Samuel’s alone to offer. And, in providential poetic justice, Samuel arrived just in time to see the smoke arise.
Saul’s litany of excuses would almost be funny if it weren’t so pathetic. The brave king immediately resorted to the blame game—passing the buck. First, he blamed the troops who had deserted him. He had to act quickly, he reasoned, or face losing them all. Secondly, he blamed Samuel. “If only Samuel had been punctual, I wouldn’t have been forced to sin!” Thirdly, he blamed the Philistines. “The Devil made me do it,” he reasoned. Lastly, he blamed himself while still declaring his innocence: “I forced myself,” he pleaded (11, 12).
Ultimately, none of Saul’s excuses worked with Samuel. A wise old preacher used to say, “An excuse is the skin of a reason stuffed with a lie.” Samuel viewed Saul’s rationalizations the same way.
Perhaps the saddest part of the story is that Saul likely believed his own excuses. It is apparent that he had rehearsed them beforehand—just in case. At any rate, he believed his rationalizations enough to act upon them—and then defend his sorry conduct. Be careful how you justify your actions. You may one day have to convince others; and you will ultimately have to convince God.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 5
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Trembling
(I Samuel 13:1-7)
Saul had won a decisive battle over the Ammonites, for which he gave the Lord all the glory (11:13). His next challenge would come from Israel’s perennial enemy, the Philistines. Apparently these heathen had heard of Saul’s successes, and they decided to attack before Saul could consolidate his army and fortify the border country.
The text seems to indicate that Saul was doing just that—strengthening his forces. Jonathan, however, had other plans. In a bold stroke he surprised the Philistine garrison at Geba. His courage inspired Saul to action, and the fight was on (3, 4)!
The Philistine army, however, had been secretly amassing a tremendous military force. Saul’s newly enlisted army would be no match against the heathen multitude. In fact, as soon as the Philistine military prowess became apparent, the Israelites literally ran for the hills (6). Saul’s dreams of glory were fading fast.
Saul, still encamped at Gilgal, was able to hold his reluctant army together. The Bible tells us that “all the people followed him [Saul] trembling.” They were fearful, but they followed anyway.
Thus, Saul’s golden opportunity for spiritual and military leadership presented itself. In the face of seemingly insurmountable odds, Saul should have inspired faith in his fearful troops. He should have arisen above the circumstances to demonstrate his unshakable confidence in the Lord. And—most importantly—he should have exercised patience in obeying Samuel’s order to wait.
As we’ll see, pressure pushed Saul to disobey Samuel—with disastrous consequences. Lesson for us: In the moment of trial, pause; and take the opportunity to become a spiritual hero.
Trembling
(I Samuel 13:1-7)
Saul had won a decisive battle over the Ammonites, for which he gave the Lord all the glory (11:13). His next challenge would come from Israel’s perennial enemy, the Philistines. Apparently these heathen had heard of Saul’s successes, and they decided to attack before Saul could consolidate his army and fortify the border country.
The text seems to indicate that Saul was doing just that—strengthening his forces. Jonathan, however, had other plans. In a bold stroke he surprised the Philistine garrison at Geba. His courage inspired Saul to action, and the fight was on (3, 4)!
The Philistine army, however, had been secretly amassing a tremendous military force. Saul’s newly enlisted army would be no match against the heathen multitude. In fact, as soon as the Philistine military prowess became apparent, the Israelites literally ran for the hills (6). Saul’s dreams of glory were fading fast.
Saul, still encamped at Gilgal, was able to hold his reluctant army together. The Bible tells us that “all the people followed him [Saul] trembling.” They were fearful, but they followed anyway.
Thus, Saul’s golden opportunity for spiritual and military leadership presented itself. In the face of seemingly insurmountable odds, Saul should have inspired faith in his fearful troops. He should have arisen above the circumstances to demonstrate his unshakable confidence in the Lord. And—most importantly—he should have exercised patience in obeying Samuel’s order to wait.
As we’ll see, pressure pushed Saul to disobey Samuel—with disastrous consequences. Lesson for us: In the moment of trial, pause; and take the opportunity to become a spiritual hero.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 4
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
How to Move On
(I Samuel 12:16-25)
Sometimes our struggle with sin is more a matter of moving on from the sin than of confessing it. Let me explain: Most of us understand that the antidote for sin is confession. I John 1:9 is a well-worn pathway in the minds of conscientious Christians. We understand that broken fellowship with the Lord can only be remedied by confession, and we’re usually fairly quick to confess our sins—especially the big ones.
Once confessed, however, sin still has a way of plaguing us. I’m not speaking of habitual sins that are difficult to conquer. I’m talking about sin’s lingering influence upon the conscience. Simply put, sometimes we allow sins that have been confessed to discourage us from zealous service for God. Even though we’ve been forgiven, we hesitate to serve God because we still feel guilty and unworthy.
Samuel knew that Israel faced just such a danger. Having confessed their sin in asking for a king (19), Samuel recognized that their discouragement over the now irreversible situation could result in spiritual apathy. “After all,” they might reason, “if we’ve missed God’s will in such a big matter, what’s the use of trying to serve Him now?”
Samuel’s answer is delightfully straightforward: “Fear not: ye have done all this wickedness: yet turn not aside from following the Lord, but serve the Lord with all your heart” (20). In other words, your sins are real; they can’t be undone. The consequences are real and long-lasting, and they won’t go away. But you can still serve the Lord. How can that be? Because “the Lord will not forsake his people…it hath pleased the Lord to make you his people” (22). The past is the past. Let’s get busy and serve the Lord!
How to Move On
(I Samuel 12:16-25)
Sometimes our struggle with sin is more a matter of moving on from the sin than of confessing it. Let me explain: Most of us understand that the antidote for sin is confession. I John 1:9 is a well-worn pathway in the minds of conscientious Christians. We understand that broken fellowship with the Lord can only be remedied by confession, and we’re usually fairly quick to confess our sins—especially the big ones.
Once confessed, however, sin still has a way of plaguing us. I’m not speaking of habitual sins that are difficult to conquer. I’m talking about sin’s lingering influence upon the conscience. Simply put, sometimes we allow sins that have been confessed to discourage us from zealous service for God. Even though we’ve been forgiven, we hesitate to serve God because we still feel guilty and unworthy.
Samuel knew that Israel faced just such a danger. Having confessed their sin in asking for a king (19), Samuel recognized that their discouragement over the now irreversible situation could result in spiritual apathy. “After all,” they might reason, “if we’ve missed God’s will in such a big matter, what’s the use of trying to serve Him now?”
Samuel’s answer is delightfully straightforward: “Fear not: ye have done all this wickedness: yet turn not aside from following the Lord, but serve the Lord with all your heart” (20). In other words, your sins are real; they can’t be undone. The consequences are real and long-lasting, and they won’t go away. But you can still serve the Lord. How can that be? Because “the Lord will not forsake his people…it hath pleased the Lord to make you his people” (22). The past is the past. Let’s get busy and serve the Lord!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 3
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
God of the Second Chance
(I Samuel 12:6-15)
Israel, Samuel reminded the assembled crowd, was God’s peculiar people. As such, He had faithfully led them, protecting them from their enemies and chastening them in their backslidings. When the nation repented of her sins, God graciously forgave them. He also provided able judges to lead the people in battle against their enemies. God had given everything His people needed. God Himself was their king (12).
As we have already seen, the people’s request for a king was—in reality—rebellion against God. In effect, the people were insisting that their concept of a monarchy was superior to God’s plan of a theocracy. And, as previously emphasized, God allowed the people to get their way—even though it meant forsaking His.
One could easily conclude that Israel’s rejection of God would naturally result in His rejection of them. We’re perhaps a little surprised to read that Samuel gave them a second chance (14). In effect, Samuel told the people that even though they had been willful and rebellious, God would honor their repentance and desire to serve Him. Though they had rebelled in asking for a king, they could still see God’s hand of blessing. In other words, God would give them a second chance!
It’s never too late to be obedient. Even if we’ve made decisions that alter irrevocably the course of our lives, God can still forgive and ultimately bless our renewed obedience to Him. The key to God’s blessing is not unobtainable perfection. The key is a contrite heart, a willing spirit, and obedient actions. There’s life after bad choices, because God is the God of the second chance.
God of the Second Chance
(I Samuel 12:6-15)
Israel, Samuel reminded the assembled crowd, was God’s peculiar people. As such, He had faithfully led them, protecting them from their enemies and chastening them in their backslidings. When the nation repented of her sins, God graciously forgave them. He also provided able judges to lead the people in battle against their enemies. God had given everything His people needed. God Himself was their king (12).
As we have already seen, the people’s request for a king was—in reality—rebellion against God. In effect, the people were insisting that their concept of a monarchy was superior to God’s plan of a theocracy. And, as previously emphasized, God allowed the people to get their way—even though it meant forsaking His.
One could easily conclude that Israel’s rejection of God would naturally result in His rejection of them. We’re perhaps a little surprised to read that Samuel gave them a second chance (14). In effect, Samuel told the people that even though they had been willful and rebellious, God would honor their repentance and desire to serve Him. Though they had rebelled in asking for a king, they could still see God’s hand of blessing. In other words, God would give them a second chance!
It’s never too late to be obedient. Even if we’ve made decisions that alter irrevocably the course of our lives, God can still forgive and ultimately bless our renewed obedience to Him. The key to God’s blessing is not unobtainable perfection. The key is a contrite heart, a willing spirit, and obedient actions. There’s life after bad choices, because God is the God of the second chance.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 2
Monday, February 15, 2010
Integrity
(I Samuel 12:1-5)
Samuel was getting on in age and— with the crowning of a king—his ministry as judge in Israel was through. He wasn’t exactly retiring; he would still conduct a powerful ministry as a prophet. He was, however, stepping aside to allow the new monarch free reign.
In his little speech to the nation, Samuel made an interesting appeal in relation to his leadership. He appealed directly to his integrity. With America in the grips of an integrity crisis, such bold rhetoric is rarely heard. In fact a new philosophy has arisen in America: personal integrity doesn’t matter; public integrity does. Of course, such thinking undermines the whole concept of integrity. One of the fundamental definitions of integrity is undivided. In other words, men of integrity are the same in public and private. The public face and the private face are one.
Samuel’s appeal to integrity centered on his fair dealing. He challenged anyone to charge him with ministering for money. He asked for any who had successfully bribed him to step forward. No one moved. Samuel’s motives were pristine in the sight of the people. Simply put, Samuel was a preacher; not a politician. Too many Christian leaders put popularity and peer-group acceptance above principle. Some, sadly, are willing to sell truth down the river for financial gain or popular standing. Samuel was not one of these. His actions reflected heart integrity. He said what he meant and he meant what he said. He was indeed a man among men!
All of this begs the question: Could we as individuals make such a challenge to our friends and acquaintances? Would they, like Samuel’s of old, unanimously testify to our integrity? If not, why not?
Integrity
(I Samuel 12:1-5)
Samuel was getting on in age and— with the crowning of a king—his ministry as judge in Israel was through. He wasn’t exactly retiring; he would still conduct a powerful ministry as a prophet. He was, however, stepping aside to allow the new monarch free reign.
In his little speech to the nation, Samuel made an interesting appeal in relation to his leadership. He appealed directly to his integrity. With America in the grips of an integrity crisis, such bold rhetoric is rarely heard. In fact a new philosophy has arisen in America: personal integrity doesn’t matter; public integrity does. Of course, such thinking undermines the whole concept of integrity. One of the fundamental definitions of integrity is undivided. In other words, men of integrity are the same in public and private. The public face and the private face are one.
Samuel’s appeal to integrity centered on his fair dealing. He challenged anyone to charge him with ministering for money. He asked for any who had successfully bribed him to step forward. No one moved. Samuel’s motives were pristine in the sight of the people. Simply put, Samuel was a preacher; not a politician. Too many Christian leaders put popularity and peer-group acceptance above principle. Some, sadly, are willing to sell truth down the river for financial gain or popular standing. Samuel was not one of these. His actions reflected heart integrity. He said what he meant and he meant what he said. He was indeed a man among men!
All of this begs the question: Could we as individuals make such a challenge to our friends and acquaintances? Would they, like Samuel’s of old, unanimously testify to our integrity? If not, why not?
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 1
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Magnanimity
(I Samuel 11:12-15)
Once again we find the young King Saul acting nobly. And it’s hard to dislike a guy who displays such sterling character traits. It was nothing for oriental kings to eliminate their opponents. Saul, however, appears to be cut out of different cloth. Rather than finish off his critics when he had the chance, Saul chose to demonstrate magnanimity—to act on a higher level and from purer impulses (13). When given revenge on the proverbial silver platter, Saul refused; choosing rather to overlook the hasty words of his early critics.
In addition, Saul purposely deflected credit for the military victory. The people saw only the glory of their new leader (12). Saul knew better. He recognized that it was the Lord who “wrought salvation in Israel.” Again, Saul’s likability stock has risen!
So, the people—falling in love with their new King—went to Gilgal to “renew the kingdom.” Saul’s monarchy was publicly and formally established, and his esteem among the people bolstered his authority. Though his initial coronation had been awkward, the “king thing” was turning out O.K.
It’s too bad that Saul later lost the traits that made him great in the eyes of the people. When youthful ideals are surrendered to cynicism and bitterness, something in a man dies. Once surrendered, positive traits give way to dark passions, faith yields to suspicion, and loyalty to principle dies on the altar of pragmatism. In the end, the starry-eyed idealist so admired by common folks may become a fierce tyrant—at once feared and hated by his former supporters. Never abandon your ideals, simple faith, and love for people! Never let magnanimity die!
Happy Valentines Day!
Magnanimity
(I Samuel 11:12-15)
Once again we find the young King Saul acting nobly. And it’s hard to dislike a guy who displays such sterling character traits. It was nothing for oriental kings to eliminate their opponents. Saul, however, appears to be cut out of different cloth. Rather than finish off his critics when he had the chance, Saul chose to demonstrate magnanimity—to act on a higher level and from purer impulses (13). When given revenge on the proverbial silver platter, Saul refused; choosing rather to overlook the hasty words of his early critics.
In addition, Saul purposely deflected credit for the military victory. The people saw only the glory of their new leader (12). Saul knew better. He recognized that it was the Lord who “wrought salvation in Israel.” Again, Saul’s likability stock has risen!
So, the people—falling in love with their new King—went to Gilgal to “renew the kingdom.” Saul’s monarchy was publicly and formally established, and his esteem among the people bolstered his authority. Though his initial coronation had been awkward, the “king thing” was turning out O.K.
It’s too bad that Saul later lost the traits that made him great in the eyes of the people. When youthful ideals are surrendered to cynicism and bitterness, something in a man dies. Once surrendered, positive traits give way to dark passions, faith yields to suspicion, and loyalty to principle dies on the altar of pragmatism. In the end, the starry-eyed idealist so admired by common folks may become a fierce tyrant—at once feared and hated by his former supporters. Never abandon your ideals, simple faith, and love for people! Never let magnanimity die!
Happy Valentines Day!
Friday, February 5, 2010
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 7
Saturday, February 13, 2010
An Early Test
(I Samuel 11:1-11)
The first major test of Saul’s leadership came shortly after his awkward coronation. The good folks of Jabesh found themselves bullied by Nahash the Ammonite. Though tempted to make a covenant with the pagan—and suffer humiliating consequences, the men of Jabesh sought reprieve—in the hope that help would soon arrive (1-3).
Upon hearing of the plight of Jabesh, Saul was determined to make a stand. Interestingly, the Bible attributes Saul’s courage to the “Spirit of God,” not his inherent self-confidence. In fact, the Bible says that the Spirit of God fueled Saul’s righteous indignation and steeled his determination to deliver Jabesh from her enemies.
What transpired next fulfilled Samuel’s dire predictions of a monarchy: Saul instituted forced military enlistment on the spot, complete with the threat of death for objectors and deserters (7). The “fear of the Lord fell on the people,” and Saul raised an enormous army—easily enough to decimate the Ammonite threat.
After a brief and decisive battle, Jabesh was delivered and the Ammonite forces were scattered (11). Saul had won the day, and his confidence in God grew exponentially. The early test had proved both a battle ground and a classroom. And young Saul abandoned his fears while strengthening his faith.
His attitude of dependence, however, was short-lived. Eventually Saul’s rebellion and self-will would emerge—twin demons that would possess his soul and destroy his life. Easy lesson: Never abandon your dependence upon God!
An Early Test
(I Samuel 11:1-11)
The first major test of Saul’s leadership came shortly after his awkward coronation. The good folks of Jabesh found themselves bullied by Nahash the Ammonite. Though tempted to make a covenant with the pagan—and suffer humiliating consequences, the men of Jabesh sought reprieve—in the hope that help would soon arrive (1-3).
Upon hearing of the plight of Jabesh, Saul was determined to make a stand. Interestingly, the Bible attributes Saul’s courage to the “Spirit of God,” not his inherent self-confidence. In fact, the Bible says that the Spirit of God fueled Saul’s righteous indignation and steeled his determination to deliver Jabesh from her enemies.
What transpired next fulfilled Samuel’s dire predictions of a monarchy: Saul instituted forced military enlistment on the spot, complete with the threat of death for objectors and deserters (7). The “fear of the Lord fell on the people,” and Saul raised an enormous army—easily enough to decimate the Ammonite threat.
After a brief and decisive battle, Jabesh was delivered and the Ammonite forces were scattered (11). Saul had won the day, and his confidence in God grew exponentially. The early test had proved both a battle ground and a classroom. And young Saul abandoned his fears while strengthening his faith.
His attitude of dependence, however, was short-lived. Eventually Saul’s rebellion and self-will would emerge—twin demons that would possess his soul and destroy his life. Easy lesson: Never abandon your dependence upon God!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 6
Friday, February 12, 2010
An Awkward Beginning
(I Samuel 10:14-27)
Initially Saul was a reluctant king. Though Samuel had outlined to him in private the nature of the kingdom and his prominent position, Saul even hesitated to tell his closest family members the exciting news (16). When the moment came for Saul’s public recognition before the nation, he was conspicuously absent (21). In fact, Samuel had to pray him out of hiding (22)! Apparently Saul harbored serious doubts about his abilities, if not his calling altogether.
There’s something popularly appealing about a reluctant leader. Too often our sensibilities are accosted by men who shamelessly promote themselves to public office. It’s unabashed egotism for a man to portray himself as having all the answers. What’s worse, it’s insanity for a man to actually believe in such a self-portrayal. Certainly Saul’s reluctance made for an appealing, if not an awkward, beginning.
Perhaps Saul’s reluctance sprang from an inner dread of failure. Most coronations pompously predict the future success of the monarch. This was not the case with Saul’s ascent to the throne. In fact, Samuel declared that Saul’s coronation marked Israel’s departure from God’s will. “Ye have this day rejected your God,” Samuel declared (19). Maybe Saul viewed Samuel’s words as a portent of coming failure. Perhaps Saul recognized the futility of heading a state that had rejected God.
Saul that day became king, and—almost immediately—critics arose who questioned his abilities (27). The awkward coronation set in motion a series of events that would eventually stain Saul’s reputation with infamy.
An Awkward Beginning
(I Samuel 10:14-27)
Initially Saul was a reluctant king. Though Samuel had outlined to him in private the nature of the kingdom and his prominent position, Saul even hesitated to tell his closest family members the exciting news (16). When the moment came for Saul’s public recognition before the nation, he was conspicuously absent (21). In fact, Samuel had to pray him out of hiding (22)! Apparently Saul harbored serious doubts about his abilities, if not his calling altogether.
There’s something popularly appealing about a reluctant leader. Too often our sensibilities are accosted by men who shamelessly promote themselves to public office. It’s unabashed egotism for a man to portray himself as having all the answers. What’s worse, it’s insanity for a man to actually believe in such a self-portrayal. Certainly Saul’s reluctance made for an appealing, if not an awkward, beginning.
Perhaps Saul’s reluctance sprang from an inner dread of failure. Most coronations pompously predict the future success of the monarch. This was not the case with Saul’s ascent to the throne. In fact, Samuel declared that Saul’s coronation marked Israel’s departure from God’s will. “Ye have this day rejected your God,” Samuel declared (19). Maybe Saul viewed Samuel’s words as a portent of coming failure. Perhaps Saul recognized the futility of heading a state that had rejected God.
Saul that day became king, and—almost immediately—critics arose who questioned his abilities (27). The awkward coronation set in motion a series of events that would eventually stain Saul’s reputation with infamy.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 5
Thursday, February 11, 2010
From the Critic’s Corner
(I Samuel 10:9-13)
The change in Saul was both dramatic and immediate. Though we have no indication that young Saul had been a rabble rouser, it is obvious by the surprised reaction of onlookers that Saul had shown no propensity for the ministry (11). In fact, Saul’s uncharacteristic behavior became fodder for the idle gossips of his day (12). They simply couldn’t believe Saul’s change of heart, attitude, and actions.
In essence, the folks who took such a sudden interest in Saul were mere critics. As long as Saul remained mired in mediocrity and obscurity, he avoided the lashing of their tongues. But when he changed, when he rose above the crowd, when he exhibited an interest in the things of God, the pressure was on! And, so, Saul became the object of a derisive taunt, “Is Saul also among the prophets?”
Critics share several notable characteristics. First, they’re generally anonymous to history. In other words, history never records their names because they don’t matter—they never make a real difference.
Secondly, critics always arise against success. Had Saul just remained “Saul of Kish,” no one would have had a negative word to say. But let a young man rise to the top, and his success will earn the critics’ rage! Success always garners more critics than failure.
Thirdly, critics can inflict untold damage. Their taunt may seem insignificant; but it was another insignificant taunt spoken by idle women years later that led to Saul’s jealousy of David and ultimately to his ignominious death (I Sam. 18:7). Perhaps these early critics bent Saul’s nature toward the cynicism that later became his undoing. Whatever the case, let’s avoid the critics’ corner!
From the Critic’s Corner
(I Samuel 10:9-13)
The change in Saul was both dramatic and immediate. Though we have no indication that young Saul had been a rabble rouser, it is obvious by the surprised reaction of onlookers that Saul had shown no propensity for the ministry (11). In fact, Saul’s uncharacteristic behavior became fodder for the idle gossips of his day (12). They simply couldn’t believe Saul’s change of heart, attitude, and actions.
In essence, the folks who took such a sudden interest in Saul were mere critics. As long as Saul remained mired in mediocrity and obscurity, he avoided the lashing of their tongues. But when he changed, when he rose above the crowd, when he exhibited an interest in the things of God, the pressure was on! And, so, Saul became the object of a derisive taunt, “Is Saul also among the prophets?”
Critics share several notable characteristics. First, they’re generally anonymous to history. In other words, history never records their names because they don’t matter—they never make a real difference.
Secondly, critics always arise against success. Had Saul just remained “Saul of Kish,” no one would have had a negative word to say. But let a young man rise to the top, and his success will earn the critics’ rage! Success always garners more critics than failure.
Thirdly, critics can inflict untold damage. Their taunt may seem insignificant; but it was another insignificant taunt spoken by idle women years later that led to Saul’s jealousy of David and ultimately to his ignominious death (I Sam. 18:7). Perhaps these early critics bent Saul’s nature toward the cynicism that later became his undoing. Whatever the case, let’s avoid the critics’ corner!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 4
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Power for Service
(I Samuel 10:1-8)
At the behest of the Lord, Samuel anointed Saul to be “captain” over the Lord’s inheritance, the nation of Israel. Anointing with oil pictured God’s special selection of an individual and God’s enabling that individual to fulfill His purposes. The anointing was merely symbolic—the reality would come later.
In confirmation of his words, Samuel gave Saul several signs: (1) that the lost donkeys would be recovered, (2) that he would meet three men headed to Bethel, and (3) that he would encounter some young prophets (2-5). Samuel indicated that after the signs had been fulfilled, the Spirit of the Lord would come upon Saul, changing him into “another man” (6).
The change was not so much of inner character as it was in leadership ability. God’s Spirit would empower Saul to carry out his responsibilities. Though Saul possessed certain natural abilities, these would be magnified and multiplied by the Spirit’s resting upon him. God’s work must be done God’s way and with God’s power.
In the New Testament we read that the disciples were commanded to “tarry” in Jerusalem until they were empowered by God for divine service (Lk. 24:49). Though they had been given the responsibility of world evangelization, the Lord knew they would fail without the Spirit’s enabling. The disciples tarried, awaiting the mighty outpouring of the Spirit of God. The book of Acts records that on the Day of Pentecost the disciples were “filled with the Spirit” (Acts 2:4), finally prepared to successfully carry out their responsibilities. Like Saul and the disciples of old, we need God’s power if we’re to do His work. Pray today to be filled with the Holy Spirit (Eph. 5:18).
Power for Service
(I Samuel 10:1-8)
At the behest of the Lord, Samuel anointed Saul to be “captain” over the Lord’s inheritance, the nation of Israel. Anointing with oil pictured God’s special selection of an individual and God’s enabling that individual to fulfill His purposes. The anointing was merely symbolic—the reality would come later.
In confirmation of his words, Samuel gave Saul several signs: (1) that the lost donkeys would be recovered, (2) that he would meet three men headed to Bethel, and (3) that he would encounter some young prophets (2-5). Samuel indicated that after the signs had been fulfilled, the Spirit of the Lord would come upon Saul, changing him into “another man” (6).
The change was not so much of inner character as it was in leadership ability. God’s Spirit would empower Saul to carry out his responsibilities. Though Saul possessed certain natural abilities, these would be magnified and multiplied by the Spirit’s resting upon him. God’s work must be done God’s way and with God’s power.
In the New Testament we read that the disciples were commanded to “tarry” in Jerusalem until they were empowered by God for divine service (Lk. 24:49). Though they had been given the responsibility of world evangelization, the Lord knew they would fail without the Spirit’s enabling. The disciples tarried, awaiting the mighty outpouring of the Spirit of God. The book of Acts records that on the Day of Pentecost the disciples were “filled with the Spirit” (Acts 2:4), finally prepared to successfully carry out their responsibilities. Like Saul and the disciples of old, we need God’s power if we’re to do His work. Pray today to be filled with the Holy Spirit (Eph. 5:18).
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 3
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
When Wildest Dreams Come True
(I Samuel 9:18-27)
Every young man dreams of that sudden course of events that will change his life forever. A letter, a phone call, a chance meeting—and, almost instantaneously, fame and fortune are his. Dream as they will, for the vast majority it never happens. For Saul, however, it did.
Saul had sought the “seer” regarding his father’s lost donkeys. For Saul, the prophet was probably his last hope. If the “seer” could not locate the donkeys, Saul would return to his father empty-handed. With apprehension rising in his heart, Saul met Samuel (19).
The donkeys, it turns out, were secure. Samuel would see to their safe return. But that moment held more pressing concerns. Out of the clear blue, Samuel invited Saul to sit with him at the feast. He revealed to Saul that God had a special purpose for his life. He gave Saul the place of honor and the choicest cut of meat. In a whirlwind of surprises, Saul rose instantly from obscurity to national prominence. What, Saul’s eager heart wondered, could it all mean?
The humility of Saul’s response is at once refreshing and reassuring. His words to Samuel even hint at a deeper Scriptural knowledge—the knowledge that Israel would not forever be ruled by a Benjamite (Genesis 49:10). As we witness Saul’s youthful wonder at his good fortune, we’re strangely drawn to this man among men. Maybe, just maybe, things will turn out right—despite the prophet’s previous dire warning.
Don’t bet on it! As we shall see, behind Saul’s youthful, good natured temperament there lurked a darker side. And, as that darker side emerged, Saul’s wildest dreams vanished without a trace; and dark days settled upon Israel.
When Wildest Dreams Come True
(I Samuel 9:18-27)
Every young man dreams of that sudden course of events that will change his life forever. A letter, a phone call, a chance meeting—and, almost instantaneously, fame and fortune are his. Dream as they will, for the vast majority it never happens. For Saul, however, it did.
Saul had sought the “seer” regarding his father’s lost donkeys. For Saul, the prophet was probably his last hope. If the “seer” could not locate the donkeys, Saul would return to his father empty-handed. With apprehension rising in his heart, Saul met Samuel (19).
The donkeys, it turns out, were secure. Samuel would see to their safe return. But that moment held more pressing concerns. Out of the clear blue, Samuel invited Saul to sit with him at the feast. He revealed to Saul that God had a special purpose for his life. He gave Saul the place of honor and the choicest cut of meat. In a whirlwind of surprises, Saul rose instantly from obscurity to national prominence. What, Saul’s eager heart wondered, could it all mean?
The humility of Saul’s response is at once refreshing and reassuring. His words to Samuel even hint at a deeper Scriptural knowledge—the knowledge that Israel would not forever be ruled by a Benjamite (Genesis 49:10). As we witness Saul’s youthful wonder at his good fortune, we’re strangely drawn to this man among men. Maybe, just maybe, things will turn out right—despite the prophet’s previous dire warning.
Don’t bet on it! As we shall see, behind Saul’s youthful, good natured temperament there lurked a darker side. And, as that darker side emerged, Saul’s wildest dreams vanished without a trace; and dark days settled upon Israel.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 2
Monday, February 8, 2010
Divine Whispers
(I Samuel 9:11-17)
God speaks in a still, small voice (I Kings 19:12). Those who would listen to God must be attentive to His gentle approach. Too often the din of this world and the inner cacophony of crisis conspire to mute the whisperings of God. Samuel, however, kept his ear acutely attuned to God’s subtle voice.
Saul, seeking his father’s donkeys, had decided to engage the help of a “seer,” a prophet. He had no idea that, in meeting Samuel, the course of his life would be altered forever. As he walked through the crowd of worshippers, he did not sense the leading of sovereign providence; he did not understand the significance of each step. But Samuel knew.
The Lord had whispered in Samuel’s ear the importance of the day’s events—down to the moment he would meet Saul (15). Upon seeing the imposing visitor, the Lord assured Samuel with the words, “Behold, the man whom I spake to thee of” (17 ). Samuel, ever attentive to the whisperings of God, knew Saul was the man—Israel’s first king!
We, too, should be sensitive to the whisperings of the Lord. Scripture is the inspired whispering of God. And, as we read its pages, the Holy Spirit impresses upon our hearts precise instructions for the need of the hour. The answers we need are always just a whisper away; but we must take the time to listen.
Too many things vie for our immediate attention. Cell phones beep, ring, sing and alert; computers incessantly inform us, “You have new mail.” Background noise sometimes eliminates God’s still, small voice. Perhaps it’s time to pull the plug, get alone with your Bible, and listen for the whisperings of God.
Divine Whispers
(I Samuel 9:11-17)
God speaks in a still, small voice (I Kings 19:12). Those who would listen to God must be attentive to His gentle approach. Too often the din of this world and the inner cacophony of crisis conspire to mute the whisperings of God. Samuel, however, kept his ear acutely attuned to God’s subtle voice.
Saul, seeking his father’s donkeys, had decided to engage the help of a “seer,” a prophet. He had no idea that, in meeting Samuel, the course of his life would be altered forever. As he walked through the crowd of worshippers, he did not sense the leading of sovereign providence; he did not understand the significance of each step. But Samuel knew.
The Lord had whispered in Samuel’s ear the importance of the day’s events—down to the moment he would meet Saul (15). Upon seeing the imposing visitor, the Lord assured Samuel with the words, “Behold, the man whom I spake to thee of” (17 ). Samuel, ever attentive to the whisperings of God, knew Saul was the man—Israel’s first king!
We, too, should be sensitive to the whisperings of the Lord. Scripture is the inspired whispering of God. And, as we read its pages, the Holy Spirit impresses upon our hearts precise instructions for the need of the hour. The answers we need are always just a whisper away; but we must take the time to listen.
Too many things vie for our immediate attention. Cell phones beep, ring, sing and alert; computers incessantly inform us, “You have new mail.” Background noise sometimes eliminates God’s still, small voice. Perhaps it’s time to pull the plug, get alone with your Bible, and listen for the whisperings of God.
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 1
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Real Potential
(I Samuel 9:1-10)
Little is more tragic than wasted potential. From time to time we meet with someone who seemingly has the proverbial world by the tail. He’s smart, handsome, athletic, personable, and winsome. He is liked by all, admired by his competitors, and imitated by the young. In short, he’s got all the potential in the world.
Years pass, and we wonder what ever happened to so-and-so. Perhaps a chance meeting with a mutual acquaintance tells the story: “It sure seemed like he’d be a success, but he’s never really done anything with his life.” And so the story goes—real potential, tragically wasted.
In today’s Scripture reading we meet the young man Saul, a youth of real potential. Even his physical bearing was impressive (2). Reading the simple story of his pursuing his father’s lost donkeys, we find a young man of budding character. Note, for example, how thorough Saul was in seeking the lost animals (3, 4). When he did not find them in one location, he travelled farther. He simply wouldn’t accept easy defeat.
Notice also that Saul was thoughtful. Not only did he consider the importance of the task at hand, but he considered his father’s possible concern at his long absence (5). When contemplating a visit to the man of God, Saul’s generous heart thought about an appropriate gift (6, 7).
Lastly, take note that young Saul was thankful. His servant had the boldness to suggest a solution to their dilemma, and Saul gratefully accepted the idea, giving credit where credit was due (10). How sad that these noble traits of youth eventually faded, and all of Saul’s early potential never met with fruition! l
Real Potential
(I Samuel 9:1-10)
Little is more tragic than wasted potential. From time to time we meet with someone who seemingly has the proverbial world by the tail. He’s smart, handsome, athletic, personable, and winsome. He is liked by all, admired by his competitors, and imitated by the young. In short, he’s got all the potential in the world.
Years pass, and we wonder what ever happened to so-and-so. Perhaps a chance meeting with a mutual acquaintance tells the story: “It sure seemed like he’d be a success, but he’s never really done anything with his life.” And so the story goes—real potential, tragically wasted.
In today’s Scripture reading we meet the young man Saul, a youth of real potential. Even his physical bearing was impressive (2). Reading the simple story of his pursuing his father’s lost donkeys, we find a young man of budding character. Note, for example, how thorough Saul was in seeking the lost animals (3, 4). When he did not find them in one location, he travelled farther. He simply wouldn’t accept easy defeat.
Notice also that Saul was thoughtful. Not only did he consider the importance of the task at hand, but he considered his father’s possible concern at his long absence (5). When contemplating a visit to the man of God, Saul’s generous heart thought about an appropriate gift (6, 7).
Lastly, take note that young Saul was thankful. His servant had the boldness to suggest a solution to their dilemma, and Saul gratefully accepted the idea, giving credit where credit was due (10). How sad that these noble traits of youth eventually faded, and all of Saul’s early potential never met with fruition! l
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
The Prophet Comes of Age: I Samuel – 1
Sunday, January 31, 2010
True Repentance
(I Samuel 7:1-4)
God’s judgment relating to the Ark of the Covenant made this important religious artifact somewhat of a pariah among God’s people. We’re told that the ark was moved from Bethshemesh to Kirjathjearim where it was held in storage for about twenty years (2). Though the symbol of God’s presence had returned, the people had not returned with whole-hearted repentance to God.
The twenty years the ark was in storage saw Israel sink to serious spiritual lows. Despite the preaching of Samuel, Israel became conversant in Canaanite customs, especially Canaanite religion. They had begun to worship Baal and Ashtaroth, both pagan fertility gods (4). Samuel’s preaching was a clarion call to repentance.
First, Samuel commanded them to put away false gods. Repentance that does not fundamentally change actions is not genuine. Sincerity is discerned by change, not words.
Secondly, genuine repentance is a matter of the heart. Samuel commanded the people, “…prepare your hearts unto the Lord” (3). While outward display may be convincing to man, God looks on the heart. Anything short of inner transformation is something less than genuine repentance.
Thirdly, true repentance results in renewed service for the Lord. It is not merely a matter of giving up a vice. Repentance involves enthusiastic dedication for the Lord. In repentance, one serves the Lord as energetically as he had formerly served sin.
Shallow repentance never lasts long. In making spiritual changes, be mindful that genuine change is substantive—not merely an outward show.
True Repentance
(I Samuel 7:1-4)
God’s judgment relating to the Ark of the Covenant made this important religious artifact somewhat of a pariah among God’s people. We’re told that the ark was moved from Bethshemesh to Kirjathjearim where it was held in storage for about twenty years (2). Though the symbol of God’s presence had returned, the people had not returned with whole-hearted repentance to God.
The twenty years the ark was in storage saw Israel sink to serious spiritual lows. Despite the preaching of Samuel, Israel became conversant in Canaanite customs, especially Canaanite religion. They had begun to worship Baal and Ashtaroth, both pagan fertility gods (4). Samuel’s preaching was a clarion call to repentance.
First, Samuel commanded them to put away false gods. Repentance that does not fundamentally change actions is not genuine. Sincerity is discerned by change, not words.
Secondly, genuine repentance is a matter of the heart. Samuel commanded the people, “…prepare your hearts unto the Lord” (3). While outward display may be convincing to man, God looks on the heart. Anything short of inner transformation is something less than genuine repentance.
Thirdly, true repentance results in renewed service for the Lord. It is not merely a matter of giving up a vice. Repentance involves enthusiastic dedication for the Lord. In repentance, one serves the Lord as energetically as he had formerly served sin.
Shallow repentance never lasts long. In making spiritual changes, be mindful that genuine change is substantive—not merely an outward show.
The Prophet Comes of Age I Samuel – 2
Monday, February 1, 2010
Elements of Revival
(I Samuel 7:5-11)
Having reviewed with Israel the nature of genuine repentance, Samuel watched as significant, necessary changes took place. The Canaanite fertility gods, so long embraced by Israel, were “put away;” and the nation once again returned to the Lord—serving Him exclusively (4).
Upon seeing the initial indications of national revival, Samuel called the people to Mizpeh for a prayer meeting. Notice that revival involved both Samuel’s preaching and his prayers. Preaching alone can not meet the need of the hour. To be effective, preaching must be bathed in prayer—both public and private. And so, Samuel prayed (5).
Israel’s renewed spiritual sensitivity called for a striking public demonstration of inner remorse. In a ceremony of repentance and consecration, the people “drew water, and poured it out before the Lord.” The water was meant to symbolize Israel’s sorrowful repentance (II Sam. 23:16). It was also meant to symbolize national renewal.
In addition to public ceremony, the people fasted. Theirs was not a contrived ritual aimed at gaining the attention of the Deity. Rather, their concern for spiritual matters overshadowed their concern for the physical. Genuine fasting, whether spontaneous or planned, forsakes physical satisfaction because spiritual hunger is far more pressing.
Ultimately, confession (“we have sinned against the Lord”—vs. 3) led to victory. Samuel prayed, “and the Lord heard him” (9). And, once His people were right with Him, the Lord gave them stunning victory over their enemies (10, 11). And He will do the same today!
Elements of Revival
(I Samuel 7:5-11)
Having reviewed with Israel the nature of genuine repentance, Samuel watched as significant, necessary changes took place. The Canaanite fertility gods, so long embraced by Israel, were “put away;” and the nation once again returned to the Lord—serving Him exclusively (4).
Upon seeing the initial indications of national revival, Samuel called the people to Mizpeh for a prayer meeting. Notice that revival involved both Samuel’s preaching and his prayers. Preaching alone can not meet the need of the hour. To be effective, preaching must be bathed in prayer—both public and private. And so, Samuel prayed (5).
Israel’s renewed spiritual sensitivity called for a striking public demonstration of inner remorse. In a ceremony of repentance and consecration, the people “drew water, and poured it out before the Lord.” The water was meant to symbolize Israel’s sorrowful repentance (II Sam. 23:16). It was also meant to symbolize national renewal.
In addition to public ceremony, the people fasted. Theirs was not a contrived ritual aimed at gaining the attention of the Deity. Rather, their concern for spiritual matters overshadowed their concern for the physical. Genuine fasting, whether spontaneous or planned, forsakes physical satisfaction because spiritual hunger is far more pressing.
Ultimately, confession (“we have sinned against the Lord”—vs. 3) led to victory. Samuel prayed, “and the Lord heard him” (9). And, once His people were right with Him, the Lord gave them stunning victory over their enemies (10, 11). And He will do the same today!
The Prophet Comes of Age I Samuel – 3
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Ebenezer
(I Samuel 7:12-17)
The familiar hymn Come Thou Fount contains the words, “Here I raise mine Ebenezer; hither by Thy help I come.” Even some seasoned saints raise their eyebrows at these words, dutifully singing them without having a clue what they mean. Well, today’s passage comprises the source of the hymn writer’s inspiration.
Having won a stunning victory over the Philistines, the prophet Samuel erected a stone monument—similar to a war memorial (12). It was intended to be a permanent reminder to Israel that the Lord had helped them. The word Ebenezer literally means “stone of help.” On seeing the monument, the nation was to recall their inability and the Lord’s gracious assistance.
Samuel’s godly influence was, however, far more powerful than his monument. We’re told that “the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel.” In other words, God blessed a man, not a monument. Too many church folks view fancy buildings as an indication of God’s blessing. In reality, God blesses people, and the monuments are merely byproducts. The focus, then, must never become the physical.
God used Samuel to call His people back into vital relationship with Him. Based on their repentance and Samuel’s ongoing prayers, God granted victory to His people. Ground that had long ago been lost to the Philistines was regained, (14) and the nation entered a period of peace.
Was the blessing due to Samuel’s monument? No! The blessing continued because Samuel remained faithful (15-17). In fact, the aging judge and prophet continued his preaching circuit and faithfully maintained “an altar unto the Lord” (17). God blesses faithful men!
Ebenezer
(I Samuel 7:12-17)
The familiar hymn Come Thou Fount contains the words, “Here I raise mine Ebenezer; hither by Thy help I come.” Even some seasoned saints raise their eyebrows at these words, dutifully singing them without having a clue what they mean. Well, today’s passage comprises the source of the hymn writer’s inspiration.
Having won a stunning victory over the Philistines, the prophet Samuel erected a stone monument—similar to a war memorial (12). It was intended to be a permanent reminder to Israel that the Lord had helped them. The word Ebenezer literally means “stone of help.” On seeing the monument, the nation was to recall their inability and the Lord’s gracious assistance.
Samuel’s godly influence was, however, far more powerful than his monument. We’re told that “the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel.” In other words, God blessed a man, not a monument. Too many church folks view fancy buildings as an indication of God’s blessing. In reality, God blesses people, and the monuments are merely byproducts. The focus, then, must never become the physical.
God used Samuel to call His people back into vital relationship with Him. Based on their repentance and Samuel’s ongoing prayers, God granted victory to His people. Ground that had long ago been lost to the Philistines was regained, (14) and the nation entered a period of peace.
Was the blessing due to Samuel’s monument? No! The blessing continued because Samuel remained faithful (15-17). In fact, the aging judge and prophet continued his preaching circuit and faithfully maintained “an altar unto the Lord” (17). God blesses faithful men!
The Prophet Comes of Age I Samuel – 4
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
When Godly Parenting Fails
(I Samuel 8:1-6)
Without a doubt, Samuel was a godly man. Though not perfect, the Scriptures uniformly view him as a hero of the faith, one who stood faithfully for God throughout his ministry. When we read of his sons’ shortcomings, therefore, we find ourselves perplexed. How could it be that Samuel’s sons “walked not in his ways” (3)? What went wrong?
Scripture gives no indications as to Samuel’s parenting style. Pure conjecture could surmise that Samuel gave too much time to the ministry and not enough time to his family; but the Bible doesn’t say. Maybe Samuel’s relationship with his wife was strained; but the Bible doesn’t say. What the Bible does tell us is that Samuel, a godly prophet, experienced disappointment in his sons.
It is entirely possible for parents to do everything right and yet see their children do wrong—especially when they’re young. Just like adults, children possess both a sin nature and a free will. Proper child rearing can restrain the sin nature, but it can’t eradicate it. Discipline and training can bend the child’s will in the right direction, but it can’t insure that children will always make right choices. The scary truth for parents is that sometimes even well-trained children make foolish and sinful decisions.
Like any parent, Samuel took initial offense to the suggestion of replacing his sons with a king. But, unlike the average parent, Samuel took the matter to the Lord in prayer (6). Even when deeply offended by the elders, Samuel had the spiritual insight to seek God’s will, not his own. Consistency counts. And God will bless and direct when we faithfully acknowledge Him—even when things don’t turn out like we had hoped (Prov. 3:5-6).
When Godly Parenting Fails
(I Samuel 8:1-6)
Without a doubt, Samuel was a godly man. Though not perfect, the Scriptures uniformly view him as a hero of the faith, one who stood faithfully for God throughout his ministry. When we read of his sons’ shortcomings, therefore, we find ourselves perplexed. How could it be that Samuel’s sons “walked not in his ways” (3)? What went wrong?
Scripture gives no indications as to Samuel’s parenting style. Pure conjecture could surmise that Samuel gave too much time to the ministry and not enough time to his family; but the Bible doesn’t say. Maybe Samuel’s relationship with his wife was strained; but the Bible doesn’t say. What the Bible does tell us is that Samuel, a godly prophet, experienced disappointment in his sons.
It is entirely possible for parents to do everything right and yet see their children do wrong—especially when they’re young. Just like adults, children possess both a sin nature and a free will. Proper child rearing can restrain the sin nature, but it can’t eradicate it. Discipline and training can bend the child’s will in the right direction, but it can’t insure that children will always make right choices. The scary truth for parents is that sometimes even well-trained children make foolish and sinful decisions.
Like any parent, Samuel took initial offense to the suggestion of replacing his sons with a king. But, unlike the average parent, Samuel took the matter to the Lord in prayer (6). Even when deeply offended by the elders, Samuel had the spiritual insight to seek God’s will, not his own. Consistency counts. And God will bless and direct when we faithfully acknowledge Him—even when things don’t turn out like we had hoped (Prov. 3:5-6).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)