Saturday, March 6, 2010
Trouble on Steroids
(I Samuel 17:1-14)
“Into every life some rain must fall.” So goes the old saying, assuring us that trouble is the sure inheritance of the human race. Troubles, however, come in different sizes. The daily “mist” of interruptions, delays, and minor frustrations pales in comparison to the periodic hurricanes of job upheaval, serious illness, and unexpected death. Today’s passage records Israel’s confrontation with trouble on steroids.
The Philistines suffered significant losses in their defeat at Michmash (14:31). Unwilling to risk another debilitating military debacle, they engaged Israel in a challenge known as representative battle. Such a battle, not uncommon in the near east, involved opposing sides each choosing a warrior as a representative. The agreement, outlined in verses 8 and 9, is typical of such military arrangements.
The Philistine champion, Goliath of Gath, was formidable indeed! Standing at 9 feet, six inches, he was definitely head and shoulders above the rest. Likely, Goliath was descended from the giant sons of Anak who lived in the southwest corner of Palestine (Joshua 11:22). Whatever his origin, Goliath represented a significant challenge to Israel. To make matters worse, his continual taunting (10) inspired fear in Israel’s fighting forces. Any resolve they had possessed melted away in the presence of the savage Philistine warrior (11).
Israel’s response, however, was unfounded. God had already proven Himself to be Israel’s champion. Perhaps Saul’s instability caused his men to doubt, but God Himself had never failed. In fact, trouble on steroids would provide an opportunity for God to show Himself mighty on the behalf of His people. Say, maybe that’s why you’re facing such monumental problems. Maybe God wants to prove Himself to you!
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 6
Friday, March 5, 2010
Attitude Adjustment
(I Samuel 16:14-23)
Attitude has a bearing on everything in life. From simple, temporary depression to deep-seated psychosis, mental and emotional disturbances can cripple otherwise healthy, intelligent individuals. Compounded with spiritual dearth, a bad attitude can lead to uncharacteristic negative behavior. From the time of his rejection from the kingship, Saul’s emotional life began a downward spiral that would ultimately result in his personal destruction.
In today’s passage we meet with an interesting declaration. Speaking of Saul, the Bible says, “…an evil spirit from the Lord troubled him.” Some commentators have imagined that this is a reference to demonic possession. While the departing of the Spirit of the Lord certainly opened Saul to demonic influences, it is probably better to view the “evil spirit from the Lord” as a spirit of discontent, depression, discouragement—simply put, as a bad attitude. Judges 9:23 records similarly that God “sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem…”
Whatever the source, Saul’s attitude would frequently dip to unreasoning rages, fits of terror, and even homicidal violence. As the years rolled on, his manic depression increased with fewer prolonged periods of mental stability. History records that many great leaders suffered bouts of depression. Winston Churchill frequently referred to depression as a “black dog” that would sometimes come to visit him. Saul’s depression, however, interfered with his duties as king.
Interestingly, the only antidote for Saul’s bad attitude—at least early on—was David’s musical ability. And, providentially God used David’s talent—and Saul’s bad attitude—to position young David in the palace of the king. Even bad attitudes can’t thwart God! And Saul’s sour disposition became David’s open door.
Attitude Adjustment
(I Samuel 16:14-23)
Attitude has a bearing on everything in life. From simple, temporary depression to deep-seated psychosis, mental and emotional disturbances can cripple otherwise healthy, intelligent individuals. Compounded with spiritual dearth, a bad attitude can lead to uncharacteristic negative behavior. From the time of his rejection from the kingship, Saul’s emotional life began a downward spiral that would ultimately result in his personal destruction.
In today’s passage we meet with an interesting declaration. Speaking of Saul, the Bible says, “…an evil spirit from the Lord troubled him.” Some commentators have imagined that this is a reference to demonic possession. While the departing of the Spirit of the Lord certainly opened Saul to demonic influences, it is probably better to view the “evil spirit from the Lord” as a spirit of discontent, depression, discouragement—simply put, as a bad attitude. Judges 9:23 records similarly that God “sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem…”
Whatever the source, Saul’s attitude would frequently dip to unreasoning rages, fits of terror, and even homicidal violence. As the years rolled on, his manic depression increased with fewer prolonged periods of mental stability. History records that many great leaders suffered bouts of depression. Winston Churchill frequently referred to depression as a “black dog” that would sometimes come to visit him. Saul’s depression, however, interfered with his duties as king.
Interestingly, the only antidote for Saul’s bad attitude—at least early on—was David’s musical ability. And, providentially God used David’s talent—and Saul’s bad attitude—to position young David in the palace of the king. Even bad attitudes can’t thwart God! And Saul’s sour disposition became David’s open door.
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 5
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Cream Rising
(I Samuel 16:12-14)
A saying common among rural folks instructs us that “the cream always rises to the top.” Of course, the saying hearkens back to milking the family cow and waiting for the cream to rise in order to skim it from the milk. The cream, the best part for non-dieters, always rises—easily separated from the more common milk. As with milk, so it is with men. The cream always rises to the top, easily distinguished from average milk. The best rise above the rest. Talent sets one apart from mediocrity. Accomplishment makes one stand out in a crowd.
David was pure cream. He was “ruddy,” meaning he had a healthy, glowing complexion. In addition, he was manfully proportioned—an outstanding specimen of young masculinity. As we learned yesterday, however, looks aren’t everything with God. God, who saw beyond David’s handsome features, detected a Godly heart as well (Acts 13:22).
In obedience to the Lord, Samuel anointed David “in the midst of his brethren” (13). In other words, from that day forward, David—at least in position—would stand out from his older brothers. Though young and inexperienced, the cream would rise to the top. The shepherd boy would excel his warrior brothers in every way: conquest, passion, leadership, and—most importantly—heart.
From the time of David’s anointing, “the spirit of the Lord came upon David.” In other words, his successes would not spring from native pluck alone. His most brilliant battles, lofty hymns of praise, and valiant feats would come from within—from the very presence of God, whose Spirit delights to fill the obedient heart. With God’s blessing, the cream would rise even farther. David, the young shepherd, would become the most revered figure in Jewish history!
Cream Rising
(I Samuel 16:12-14)
A saying common among rural folks instructs us that “the cream always rises to the top.” Of course, the saying hearkens back to milking the family cow and waiting for the cream to rise in order to skim it from the milk. The cream, the best part for non-dieters, always rises—easily separated from the more common milk. As with milk, so it is with men. The cream always rises to the top, easily distinguished from average milk. The best rise above the rest. Talent sets one apart from mediocrity. Accomplishment makes one stand out in a crowd.
David was pure cream. He was “ruddy,” meaning he had a healthy, glowing complexion. In addition, he was manfully proportioned—an outstanding specimen of young masculinity. As we learned yesterday, however, looks aren’t everything with God. God, who saw beyond David’s handsome features, detected a Godly heart as well (Acts 13:22).
In obedience to the Lord, Samuel anointed David “in the midst of his brethren” (13). In other words, from that day forward, David—at least in position—would stand out from his older brothers. Though young and inexperienced, the cream would rise to the top. The shepherd boy would excel his warrior brothers in every way: conquest, passion, leadership, and—most importantly—heart.
From the time of David’s anointing, “the spirit of the Lord came upon David.” In other words, his successes would not spring from native pluck alone. His most brilliant battles, lofty hymns of praise, and valiant feats would come from within—from the very presence of God, whose Spirit delights to fill the obedient heart. With God’s blessing, the cream would rise even farther. David, the young shepherd, would become the most revered figure in Jewish history!
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 4
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Not What We Were Expecting
(I Samuel 16:6-11)
God’s ways are not man’s ways, and often God’s choices do not fit with man’s preconceived notions. In fact, God seems to delight in surprising man by His contrary choices. For example, one would expect the King of Kings to be born in a palace; God choose a lowly stable. One would expect an Apostle to enjoy universal prestige; Paul suffered almost universal contempt. One would expect the Messiah’s forerunner to be a man of culture and refinement; God sent John the Baptist.
It was only natural for Samuel to be drawn to Eliab (6). He seemed like good king material! He was tall and strikingly handsome. Perhaps Samuel was familiar with his winsome personality and charismatic leadership traits. Whatever the reason, the Prophet thought he had discovered the Lord’s anointed at first glance.
Contrary to what he was expecting, the Lord instructed Samuel to pass by the venerable Eliab (7). Jesse, disappointed that Eliab was not the man, brought forward another of his favorite sons, Abinadab. He, too, was rejected. Perhaps the athletic Shammah was the chosen one? No, Samuel passed over him as well. One by one, the prophet examined Jesse’s sons; and one by one the Lord told Samuel to pass them up. Frustrated, Samuel asked Jesse if he had any more sons. Hesitantly, Jesse mentioned the youngest, little David the shepherd boy. And the Holy Spirit whispered to Samuel, “That’s God’s man.”
God, you see, doesn’t make judgments using human criteria. God looks upon the heart (7). And sometimes God’s choices surprise us. Our lesson: Don’t limit God. Remember, His choices are best—and often what we least expect.
Not What We Were Expecting
(I Samuel 16:6-11)
God’s ways are not man’s ways, and often God’s choices do not fit with man’s preconceived notions. In fact, God seems to delight in surprising man by His contrary choices. For example, one would expect the King of Kings to be born in a palace; God choose a lowly stable. One would expect an Apostle to enjoy universal prestige; Paul suffered almost universal contempt. One would expect the Messiah’s forerunner to be a man of culture and refinement; God sent John the Baptist.
It was only natural for Samuel to be drawn to Eliab (6). He seemed like good king material! He was tall and strikingly handsome. Perhaps Samuel was familiar with his winsome personality and charismatic leadership traits. Whatever the reason, the Prophet thought he had discovered the Lord’s anointed at first glance.
Contrary to what he was expecting, the Lord instructed Samuel to pass by the venerable Eliab (7). Jesse, disappointed that Eliab was not the man, brought forward another of his favorite sons, Abinadab. He, too, was rejected. Perhaps the athletic Shammah was the chosen one? No, Samuel passed over him as well. One by one, the prophet examined Jesse’s sons; and one by one the Lord told Samuel to pass them up. Frustrated, Samuel asked Jesse if he had any more sons. Hesitantly, Jesse mentioned the youngest, little David the shepherd boy. And the Holy Spirit whispered to Samuel, “That’s God’s man.”
God, you see, doesn’t make judgments using human criteria. God looks upon the heart (7). And sometimes God’s choices surprise us. Our lesson: Don’t limit God. Remember, His choices are best—and often what we least expect.
David: Young Hero, Future King I Samuel – 3
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Wasted Tears
(I Samuel 16:1-5)
Genuine friendship mourns deeply its losses. Those who love strongly grieve intensely when relationships go awry. The Prophet Samuel, a spiritually consecrated man, forged resilient bonds of friendship with Saul. Saul’s sins, however, broke the relationship, and—after parting ways—they never saw each other again.
The breach in friendship did not engender bitterness in Samuel. He was too spiritual for that. Rather, Samuel mourned for Saul as if he had died (15:35). He wept for the potential lost, the talent wasted, and the heart hardened. He also wept because he had lost a real friend.
Sin is always destructive. Sin always does its alienating work. Sin builds walls of mistrust and betrayal that may never come down. So it was between Samuel and Saul. Their friendship ended, and intense loneliness set in for Samuel. The Scripture records that both God and Samuel were deeply disappointed (15:35).
Even in significant loss, there comes a time to stop grieving. The grieving process is normal, but it should also be temporary. Life must go on. The sun comes up after our darkest nights—and it does so until the end of time. When Samuel’s grief had gone too far, the Lord rebuked him: “How long wilt thou mourn for Saul?” God’s question indicated that the time for sorrow had past. God then instructed the old prophet that there was still work to do. A new king would be needed, and Samuel would once again do the anointing (16:1).
Though Samuel’s estrangement from Saul caused him to his former friend (2), Samuel did as the Lord commanded. Samuel had no idea he was about to meet a future hero, warrior, and king. Something good was about to happen, and Samuel needed to dry his tears in order to see it!
Wasted Tears
(I Samuel 16:1-5)
Genuine friendship mourns deeply its losses. Those who love strongly grieve intensely when relationships go awry. The Prophet Samuel, a spiritually consecrated man, forged resilient bonds of friendship with Saul. Saul’s sins, however, broke the relationship, and—after parting ways—they never saw each other again.
The breach in friendship did not engender bitterness in Samuel. He was too spiritual for that. Rather, Samuel mourned for Saul as if he had died (15:35). He wept for the potential lost, the talent wasted, and the heart hardened. He also wept because he had lost a real friend.
Sin is always destructive. Sin always does its alienating work. Sin builds walls of mistrust and betrayal that may never come down. So it was between Samuel and Saul. Their friendship ended, and intense loneliness set in for Samuel. The Scripture records that both God and Samuel were deeply disappointed (15:35).
Even in significant loss, there comes a time to stop grieving. The grieving process is normal, but it should also be temporary. Life must go on. The sun comes up after our darkest nights—and it does so until the end of time. When Samuel’s grief had gone too far, the Lord rebuked him: “How long wilt thou mourn for Saul?” God’s question indicated that the time for sorrow had past. God then instructed the old prophet that there was still work to do. A new king would be needed, and Samuel would once again do the anointing (16:1).
Though Samuel’s estrangement from Saul caused him to his former friend (2), Samuel did as the Lord commanded. Samuel had no idea he was about to meet a future hero, warrior, and king. Something good was about to happen, and Samuel needed to dry his tears in order to see it!
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 2
Monday, March 1, 2010
Fear and Failure
(I Samuel 15:23-35)
After what must have been a heated conversation between him and Samuel, King Saul finally admitted his disobedience. From the earlier context we know that Saul made excuses and mentally minimized his sin. The old prophet would have none of it! He pointedly reminded Saul that his disobedience was as serious a matter as witchcraft and idolatry (23). No words needed to be minced; the truth is the truth.
In an interesting twist, Saul gives insight into his disobedience. Perhaps he is just making another excuse—once again blaming the people—or, just maybe, he gives a genuine glimpse into his thinking. Saul declares, “I have transgressed the commandment of the Lord, and thy words; because I feared the people, and obeyed their voice” (emphasis added). Perhaps Saul’s underlying motivation in disobedience really was fear.
Proverbs 29:25 says, “The fear of man bringeth a snare.” In other words, fearing what men think is a trap. One’s behavior is determined by what he fears. For example, if one fears the criticism of others, he may spend money he doesn’t have to impress people he doesn’t like. As foolish as that sounds, it happens all the time. One who fears social isolation may, even against his conscience, sip a cocktail or tip back a beer—just to fit in. Maybe a lady who knows better decides to wear a short skirt or tight top so that her “friends” won’t think she’s “not with it.” All of these are actions taken out of fear.
In the given examples, the outcomes would have been different had these folks feared God more than men. Fearing God would have helped them make right choices. Saul “feared the people” more than he feared God, and he lost the kingdom over it. Think about it: Who do you fear?
Fear and Failure
(I Samuel 15:23-35)
After what must have been a heated conversation between him and Samuel, King Saul finally admitted his disobedience. From the earlier context we know that Saul made excuses and mentally minimized his sin. The old prophet would have none of it! He pointedly reminded Saul that his disobedience was as serious a matter as witchcraft and idolatry (23). No words needed to be minced; the truth is the truth.
In an interesting twist, Saul gives insight into his disobedience. Perhaps he is just making another excuse—once again blaming the people—or, just maybe, he gives a genuine glimpse into his thinking. Saul declares, “I have transgressed the commandment of the Lord, and thy words; because I feared the people, and obeyed their voice” (emphasis added). Perhaps Saul’s underlying motivation in disobedience really was fear.
Proverbs 29:25 says, “The fear of man bringeth a snare.” In other words, fearing what men think is a trap. One’s behavior is determined by what he fears. For example, if one fears the criticism of others, he may spend money he doesn’t have to impress people he doesn’t like. As foolish as that sounds, it happens all the time. One who fears social isolation may, even against his conscience, sip a cocktail or tip back a beer—just to fit in. Maybe a lady who knows better decides to wear a short skirt or tight top so that her “friends” won’t think she’s “not with it.” All of these are actions taken out of fear.
In the given examples, the outcomes would have been different had these folks feared God more than men. Fearing God would have helped them make right choices. Saul “feared the people” more than he feared God, and he lost the kingdom over it. Think about it: Who do you fear?
The Epic Tragedy: King Saul I Samuel – 1
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Better than Sacrifice
(I Samuel 15:16-23)
Human nature always attempts to buy its way out of trouble. Rather than deal with the root cause of the problem, we think that we can make everything right if we throw enough money at it. For example, a husband utters some hasty, unkind words to his wife. Feeling bad later that day, he buys her a dozen roses (or two dozen, as the transgression may merit). Of course, that should fix the problem, right? After all, they weren’t even on sale! What he fails to understand is that roses didn’t cause the problem and they’re unlikely to fix it.
Saul practiced the same type of bartering on a much larger scale. Having been commanded to “utterly destroy” the Amalekites, Saul determined to spare King Agag, and he allowed the people to plunder the flocks and herds. In short, his actions were direct disobedience to God.
When confronted a second time, how did Saul respond? He blamed the people again and he claimed he was making a spiritual sacrifice again (21). Samuel was probably a little tired of this well-worn excuse (see verse 15). So, in no uncertain terms, he explained to Saul that he could not buy himself out of his troubles. “To obey is better than sacrifice,” Samuel intoned. In other words, no amount of sacrifice, service, money, time, dedication, or good intentions can take the place of simple obedience.
It’s time we stopped trying to buy God off. Rather, we should openly and freely confess our sins and failures to Him. Then, with a heart cleansed from sin and a conscience freed from guild, we should seek to obey Him. Personal sacrifice is nice. It has its place. It’s the icing on the cake. But it can never replace simple obedience as the primary hope of God for His Children.
Better than Sacrifice
(I Samuel 15:16-23)
Human nature always attempts to buy its way out of trouble. Rather than deal with the root cause of the problem, we think that we can make everything right if we throw enough money at it. For example, a husband utters some hasty, unkind words to his wife. Feeling bad later that day, he buys her a dozen roses (or two dozen, as the transgression may merit). Of course, that should fix the problem, right? After all, they weren’t even on sale! What he fails to understand is that roses didn’t cause the problem and they’re unlikely to fix it.
Saul practiced the same type of bartering on a much larger scale. Having been commanded to “utterly destroy” the Amalekites, Saul determined to spare King Agag, and he allowed the people to plunder the flocks and herds. In short, his actions were direct disobedience to God.
When confronted a second time, how did Saul respond? He blamed the people again and he claimed he was making a spiritual sacrifice again (21). Samuel was probably a little tired of this well-worn excuse (see verse 15). So, in no uncertain terms, he explained to Saul that he could not buy himself out of his troubles. “To obey is better than sacrifice,” Samuel intoned. In other words, no amount of sacrifice, service, money, time, dedication, or good intentions can take the place of simple obedience.
It’s time we stopped trying to buy God off. Rather, we should openly and freely confess our sins and failures to Him. Then, with a heart cleansed from sin and a conscience freed from guild, we should seek to obey Him. Personal sacrifice is nice. It has its place. It’s the icing on the cake. But it can never replace simple obedience as the primary hope of God for His Children.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)